Tom Jenkinson [
http://community.jboss.org/people/tomjenkinson] created the discussion
"Re: Remote Txn Inflow: Synchronizations"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/629409#629409
--------------------------------------------------------------
David Lloyd wrote:
> Jonathan Halliday wrote:
> Register Syncs with the local subordinate and register a single Sync in the parent,
using the impl thereof to pass the beforeCompletion call down to the subordinate
coordinator. Work needed on the TS side: none for beforeCompletion as it's already
exposed. Some to expose afterCompletion and allow some way for commit|rollback to indicate
afterCompletion processing should be deferred until an explicit call for it is made, as
they currently bundle it in automatically and must continue to do so in the default JCA
case.
>
>
I like solution #2 for now (single sync in the parent), for speed and simplicity (it is
more or less what I have already planned on doing); adding functionality for propagating
calls up the chain can add a lot of complexity (thus risk given the short timeframe) for
us. If later on we discover we need two phases, then moving to #1 later on should be not
be a problem, though it could add significant latency.
The only thing I'd be concerned about is the extra work that you'd have to do for
exposing this hook, but it shouldn't block us as long as it appears sometime before
the EAP final release (we can just mark the source with comments at the appropriate
location; we should be able to test most functionality without it).
This is what I was attempting to describe above. That said, the limitation with this
approach is clear, in the case where there are no synchronizations registered on the
subordinate TM, we will still have to call each subordinate TM with a beforeCompletion
message as the root TM will not be aware of which subordinates do/don't have
sync's registered, a perfomance penalty.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/629409#629409]
Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]