Also another + towards the DummyTM is that it is comparatively
lightweight (small/quick) for unit tests. I haven't tried JBossTS in
the test suite to know how this will impact test suite execution
time, so this argument may be pointless, just thought I'd mention.
On 27 Sep 2007, at 07:05, Bela Ban wrote:
Sure, but don't we have more important things to do right now ?
Let's do it, but I wouldn't do it *now*
Jason T. Greene wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am not sure if there has been a discussion on this before, but
> What do you guys think about replacing the DummyTransactionManager
> with JBoss(Arjuna)JTA? Perhaps it makes sense to leave it as a
> mock test, but I was thinking it might be a good idea to offer
> everyone an integrated solid TM out of the box.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Jason
> _______________________________________________
> jbosscache-dev mailing list
> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
--
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups / JBoss Clustering team
JBoss - a division of Red Hat
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat