I think the forum is fine as is (that is the reason I didn't add anything to it
earlier).
-----Original Message-----
From: Manik Surtani [mailto:manik@jboss.org]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 8:36 PM
To: Ben Wang
Cc: jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on JBCACHE-794?
Could you pls update the forum accordingly.
Thanks,
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Email: manik(a)jboss.org
Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
MSN: manik(a)surtani.org
Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
On 27 Oct 2006, at 12:57, Ben Wang wrote:
Please go ahead. I don't see any adverse effect so far.
Thanks,
-Ben
-----Original Message-----
From: Manik Surtani [mailto:manik@jboss.org]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 7:27 PM
To: Ben Wang
Cc: jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Thoughts on JBCACHE-794?
Hey Ben,
Any thoughts on this issue?
http://jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979697
Do you (or anyone else) see any adverse effects that could arise by
setting the lock acquisition timeout on the eviction thread to 0?
It would remove the chance of this deadlock occuring, plus improve
performance in general as evictions will happen in a more timely
fashion.
Cheers,
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Email: manik(a)jboss.org
Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
MSN: manik(a)surtani.org
Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani