Re: [jbosscache-dev] Naming 2.2.0 and 3.0.0
What do you reckon then, straight on to 3.0.0, and a 2.1.1 for bug
fixes, etc. on 2.1.0?
On 20 Mar 2008, at 18:37, Brian Stansberry wrote:
Good argument for no 2.2!! We're running out of peppers. ;)
Manik Surtani wrote:
> Alright, that time has come again for some creative naming of
> upcoming JBC releases. :-)
> Thoughts and opinions, people?
> Poblano and Naga? :-)
> --
> Manik Surtani
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> manik(a)jboss.org
> _______________________________________________
> jbosscache-dev mailing list
> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
manik(a)jboss.org