OK, if it doesn't belong in the AS, then JBC has to provide a reliable
alternative, one that's not @Experimental and not
based-on-a-project-that's-last-release-was-1.0-in August-2005. :)
The AS need to reliably passivate sessions is real.
Bela Ban wrote:
-1. I don't see what FCL has to do in the AS...
Brian Stansberry wrote:
> Manik Surtani wrote:
>> What do you guys think? Too many people try and use this in
>> production and then complain that it doesn't work. It is not
>> transactional and cannot withstand a JVM crash midway during a write.
>>
>> Should we deprecate this in 2.2.0 and remove it in 3.0.0?
>>
>> I know that JBoss AS uses it in some cases, but can that not be
>> changed to use the JDBM cache loader?
>>
>
> No, it can't. :( Unfortunately, JDBM appears to be a pretty dead project.
>
> FCL is just an impl of a pluggable interface though. If you don't want
> it in 3.0 and if we can't find a valid replacement by the time AS is
> ready to consume 3.0, then I can always pull the FCL code into the
> AS/EJB3 source tree.
>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Manik Surtani
>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>> manik(a)jboss.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosscache-dev mailing list
>> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com