Re: [jbosscache-dev] Branch and tag maintenance

Sorry; couldn't connect to mail server the other day and forgot to resend. Couple comments: 1) Release qualifiers are dot appended, so using "2.1.0-GA" instead of "2.1.0.GA" is confusing.

2) Not sure why you'd include the release qualifier in the branch name, unless the intent was to stop work on that branch when the named qualifier was reached. E.g. when 2.1.0.Alpha1 is tagged, will work on branch 2.1.0.Alpha1 stop, with work then beginning on 2.1.0.Alpha2? (I hope not, as that means doing a new checkout or jumping through other hoops.)

- Brian Manik Surtani wrote: > Anyone? Thoughts, comments? > On 22 Aug 2007, at 11:22, Manik Surtani wrote: >> I'd like to normalise and clean up the naming of branches and >> tags. What I propose going forward is on the wiki. Please have >> a look and comment asap >> >> http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossCacheDevelopment >> >> See section under "Branches and tags" and "Legacy branches and >> tags". >> >> One of the things I'd like to do is to move the old imported >> branches and tags to conform to this naming standard. >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Manik Surtani >> >> Lead, JBoss Cache >> JBoss, a division of Red Hat >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosscache-dev mailing list >> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev > -- > Manik Surtani > Lead, JBoss Cache > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > _______________________________________________ > jbosscache-dev mailing list > jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev -- Brian Stansberry Lead, AS Clustering JBoss, a division of Red Hat brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com