+1 on getting JGRP-130 resolved first
Galder ZamarreƱo
Support Engineer
JBoss, a division of RedHat
-----Original Message-----
From: jbosscache-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:jbosscache-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Brian Stansberry
Sent: 25 August 2006 15:56
To: Manik Surtani; Bela Ban
Cc: jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: RE: [jbosscache-dev] Re: [JBoss JIRA] Resolved: (JGRP-65)Performancetests and
publish results
If what we're talking about here is switching to a TCP-based stack as
the default, I'd be concerned about doing that until
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-130 is resolved.
If we're just talking using the optimized configs for each protocol, yes
definitely.
jbosscache-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org wrote:
Yep, +1
> In that case, let's complete the JIRA Brian created and then simply
> copy over the config to JBossCache
>
> Manik Surtani wrote:
>> I was also talking about the default XML files shipped with JBC for
>> standalone use.
>>
>> Multiplexer related changes would only be for usage within AS. --
>> Manik Surtani
>>
>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>
>> Email: manik(a)jboss.org
>> Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
>> MSN: manik(a)surtani.org
>> Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
>>
>>
>> On 25 Aug 2006, at 13:18, Bela Ban wrote:
>>
>>> Yes - Brian has a JIRA task open regarding this, for the
>>> Multiplexer. Meaning, you wouldn't be affected
>>>
>>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>>> Would this mean a prudent change in the default configs shipped
>>>> with JBC/JBossAS? --
>>>> Manik Surtani
>>>>
>>>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>>>
>>>> Email: manik(a)jboss.org <mailto:manik@jboss.org>
>>>> Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
>>>> MSN: manik(a)surtani.org <mailto:manik@surtani.org>
>>>> Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 25 Aug 2006, at 12:39, Bela Ban wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ben Wang wrote:
>>>>>> Bela,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very good documentation and good numbers. I think once
>>>>>> threadless stack is ready in 2.5, we will see dramatic
>>>>>> performance boost on JBoss Cache level as well!
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely ! Parellel processing will definitely help both
>>>>> JBossCache and clustering (ClusterPartition).
>>>>>
>>>>>> So looks like TCP performs better than UDP now. Is this the
>>>>>> first time that we have seen this?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, that's always been the case for those smaller clusters. It
>>>>> will be interesting to see what happens on a 64 node cluster
>>>>> though.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Bela Ban
>>>>> Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group JBoss - a division
>>>>> of Red Hat
>>>>
>>>
>>> --Bela Ban
>>> Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group JBoss - a division
>>> of Red Hat
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Bela Ban
> Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group JBoss - a division of
> Red Hat
>
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Ph: 510-396-3864
skype: bstansberry
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev