Yes, this is a good point. This is a new API anyway and I just put it there as a placeholder for the time being. +1 to making it a member of TreeCache rather than a static instance. Could you please go ahead and move the REGIONS_REGISTRY from being a static member of RegionImpl to a member of TreeCache - or maybe RegionImpl (since each TreeCache instance will have 1 RegionImpl instance if region based marshalling is used). Cheers, -- Manik Surtani Lead, JBoss Cache JBoss, a division of Red Hat Email: manik(a)jboss.org Telephone: +44 7786 702 706 MSN: manik(a)surtani.org Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani On 23 Aug 2006, at 15:35, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote: > Hey Manik, > > Take a look at TreeCacheProxyImpl.getRegion(). If there are >1 cache > instances in JVM created using cache factory (just as in state > transfer > unit tests) then regions will be mixed up between different cache > instance. Static region map declared in RegionImpl should perhaps be > moved to a non-static map in cache instance? > > Or am I completely misunderstanding this. > > Vladimir > > > P.S this is the reason why some state transfer tasks continue to > fail. _______________________________________________ jbosscache-dev mailing list jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev