I already use model MBeans to expose certain JGroups services, e.g. GossipRouter and Multiplexer. It geta bit unwieldy though, with all the verbose XML... How do you suppose to expose interceptors ? I think the big problem is that we need to dynamically expose (=register) them at stack startup time ? Manik Surtani wrote: > Hi guys. > > Rather than wrestle with MBean interfaces and also add clutter to > the various interfaces we have - and also to support future > exposure of interceptors, etc. to JMX, what do you think of using > Model MBeans instead of Standard MBeans? > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/management/ > modelmbean/package-summary.html > > Now I'm no JMX expert and I may be talking nonsense here so feel > free to tear this apart. Brian, how would something like this > work for you since AS clustering gets cache references from JMX? > Do we still need to extend ServiceMBean in AS5? > > Cheers, > -- > Manik Surtani > > Lead, JBoss Cache > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > > Email: manik(a)jboss.org > Telephone: +44 7786 702 706 > MSN: manik(a)surtani.org > Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani > > > _______________________________________________ > jbosscache-dev mailing list > jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev > -- Bela Ban Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group JBoss - a division of Red Hat

I'm not sure this exists in JBoss today, or do you want to write this yourself ? Manik Surtani wrote: > Can't you register model MBeans programatically rather than via XML? > > Basically what I am thinking is an MBeanRegistrar class that > inspects your interceptor stack, and has a hardcoded list of > reflect.Methods to expose for each known interceptor type. Sure, > it means one clunky class that does all of this but is this better > than a dozen *MBean interfaces? > > Cheers, > -- > Manik Surtani > > Lead, JBoss Cache > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > > Email: manik(a)jboss.org > Telephone: +44 7786 702 706 > MSN: manik(a)surtani.org > Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani > > > On 6 Sep 2006, at 22:30, Bela Ban wrote: > >> I already use model MBeans to expose certain JGroups services, >> e.g. GossipRouter and Multiplexer. It geta bit unwieldy though, >> with all the verbose XML... How do you suppose to expose >> interceptors ? I think the big problem is that we need to >> dynamically expose (=register) them at stack startup time ? >> >> Manik Surtani wrote: >>> Hi guys. >>> >>> Rather than wrestle with MBean interfaces and also add clutter >>> to the various interfaces we have - and also to support future >>> exposure of interceptors, etc. to JMX, what do you think of >>> using Model MBeans instead of Standard MBeans? >>> >>> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/management/ >>> modelmbean/package-summary.html >>> >>> Now I'm no JMX expert and I may be talking nonsense here so feel >>> free to tear this apart. Brian, how would something like this >>> work for you since AS clustering gets cache references from >>> JMX? Do we still need to extend ServiceMBean in AS5? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> --Manik Surtani >>> >>> Lead, JBoss Cache >>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat >>> >>> Email: manik(a)jboss.org >>> Telephone: +44 7786 702 706 >>> MSN: manik(a)surtani.org >>> Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosscache-dev mailing list >>> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev >>> >> >> --Bela Ban >> Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group >> JBoss - a division of Red Hat >> > > -- Bela Ban Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group JBoss - a division of Red Hat