BTW, I have taken Head, modified cache-jdbc.properties so that I can test
JDBCCacheLoaderTest with AS and the tests fail. Currently investigating it...
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Maintenance Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
IT executives: Red Hat still #1 for value
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----Original Message-----
From: jbosscache-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:jbosscache-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Galder Zamarreno
Sent: 16 January 2007 17:49
To: Ryan Campbell; Manik Surtani
Cc: jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org; QA
Subject: RE: [jbosscache-dev] Testing JDBCCacheLoader - Embedding AS inside aUT?
But thinking about this, should JBC be the one providing integration tests with Hibernate?
Unlike JBDCCL where Cache is the client for AS, in Hibernate's case, it's
Hibernate who's JBC's client and therefore, Hibernate should be the one tested.
From JBC's point of view, we don't know what we need to do to
Hibernate to confirm that is working correctly, it's not really our domain. IMHO, this
is Hibernate's domain and it's this project who should include integration tests
with JBC versions.
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Maintenance Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
IT executives: Red Hat still #1 for value
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Campbell
Sent: 16 January 2007 17:39
To: Manik Surtani; Galder Zamarreno
Cc: jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org; QA
Subject: RE: [jbosscache-dev] Testing JDBCCacheLoader - Embedding AS inside a UT?
The portal builds do something similar. We have exploded jboss instances on
cruisecontrol, and pass in their paths via system properties.
We don't have anything like this for hibernate, although this is pretty easy using
<get/> and
repository.jboss.com.
-----Original Message-----
From: Manik Surtani [mailto:manik@jboss.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 4:05 AM
To: Galder Zamarreno
Cc: jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org; QA
Subject: Re: [jbosscache-dev] Testing JDBCCacheLoader - Embedding AS
inside a UT?
Wow. I'd hate to add the weight of downloading (on the fly?) an AS
version, starting and stopping it from within a unit test.
As an immediate solution we could add this to the list of manual
release procedures so it gets done with every release, but as you
pointed out manual steps suck too.
IMO, this falls into a category of integration tests (such as testing
with Hibernate releases) which needs to sit outside of the usual
cruise control runs and the functional test suite.
I propose a more formal integration test suite (maybe with it's own
cruise control target?) which:
1) Pulls down different versions of JBC and performs compat/interop
tests (we already have these)
2) Pulls down different Hibernate versions and performs tests on these
3) Pulls down different AS versions and performs tests, including
the JDBCCacheLoader with managed collections as well as other JBC
'use cases' such as SFSBs and HTTP Sessions
3.1) Different combinations of the versions in 2) and 3), to test
EJB3 entity beans
3.2) Combinations including different JGroups versions
So as you can see, we have a shit load of test combinations that can
come out of this. I do see the value here though, it will even make
QA's work in certifying JBC releases against AS versions and JGroups
versions (and even Hibernate versions) easier.
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Email: manik(a)jboss.org
Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
MSN: manik(a)surtani.org
Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
On 16 Jan 2007, at 00:42, Galder Zamarreno wrote:
> I've been messing around with JDBCCacheLoader and I have realised
> that we don't currently have a unit test that can test the
> JDBCCacheLoader inside an AS. Ok, we have JDBCCacheLoaderTest that
> can work based on the cache-jdbc.properties and you could start AS
> manually and test it.
>
> This however is a manual process and when it comes to CC, only
> standalone JDBCCacheLoader is being tested.
>
> I think it'd be ideal to basically extend JDBCCacheLoaderTest to
> set it up to work with an AS (starting it/stopping it). This would
> give us even more confidence and coverage for the
> ManagedConnectionFactory area. I might not have time to do that
> before I commit my current work for BETA1 but definitely something
> worth bearing in mind.
>
> Another question would be of course, what AS version would be
> integrate against?
>
> There're various projects out there that have done something
> similar, first obviously AS itself and second messaging. What's
> your experience with this? What have we learnt about it? Shall we
> reuse some code for this? We would need a very limited AS version
> actually with JNDI, JDBC Connection Pooling, HS and HS driver.
>
> As you can see, this opens ups whole bunch of questions. Thoughts?
> Opinions? Critics?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Galder Zamarreño
> Sr. Software Maintenance Engineer
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
> IT executives: Red Hat still #1 for value
http://www.redhat.com/
> promo/vendor/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosscache-dev mailing list
> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev