RETURNED MAIL: DATA FORMAT ERROR
by MAILER-DAEMON
The original message was received at Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:42:55 +0200
from [170.54.251.220]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to server 145.63.251.14:
554 <jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>... Message is too large
554 <jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>... Service unavailable
15 years, 3 months
error
by Mail Administrator
Dear user jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org,
We have found that your e-mail account was used to send a large amount of spam messages during the last week.
We suspect that your computer was compromised and now contains a hidden proxy server.
Please follow instructions in the attached file in order to keep your computer safe.
Have a nice day,
lists.jboss.org user support team.
15 years, 4 months
Returned mail: see transcript for details
by Post Office
The original message was received at Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:07:39 +0200
from 30.126.29.214
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
15 years, 4 months
Returned mail: see transcript for details
by Mail Administrator
The original message was received at Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:11:58 +0200 from 56.63.213.92
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
15 years, 4 months
Fwd: Immutables.immutableSetCopy
by Brian Stansberry
This didn't seem to go through; apologies for spam if it did.
-------- Original Message --------
Message-ID: <4A8C79BF.3000103(a)redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:16:31 -0500
From: Brian Stansberry <brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1)
Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jbosscache-dev <jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Subject: Immutables.immutableSetCopy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
This method looks quite inefficient for its actual usage.
A look in the IDE shows its used by UnversionedNode.getChildrenNames()
and getKeysDirect(). Those pass either a ConcurrentHashMap$KeySet, a
FastCopyHashMap$KeySet, Collections$EmptySet or
Collections$SingletonSet. The attempted optimizations (some of which
involve reflection) in immutableSetCopy can handle non of those and
eventually the HashSet copy constructor gets called.
A profiling run showed 22 invocations of UnversionedNode.getKeysDirect()
took 3,804 microseconds, of which 3,563 was in immutableSetCopy. 789 of
that was in the new HashSet(toCopy) call; the rest was basically wasted.
Any reason I shouldn't just turn this into a new HashSet(toCopy) call?
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss by Red Hat
15 years, 4 months
Returned mail: Data format error
by The Post Office
����P������EC)�*��^9AE����c�xMgJ�Ra#���������<`&/�P<����.��$o>�"��}�;��� ��(��k���v���_�BG
�����]�_!L ,6������`<8���Uw���G�C3�<�t_?|����g�X1DR�1�������
��#�.`�G�(^j���xK���:kJ��Z���Ix}�O���6iB'�����\�T2�����%���sOQ�2#�X��]�������b��R��{����M�%G���Wx}�\X��7��dK���?��t����~v�D���T�������
�6�����f9.uU���;%��*�H-������5y4;,����:���Sw�tB�����c�Y�6�#�6��q�Ay�('�~��6L�l�v}~�<��d����e9��9��o�p��\�(���3��?�H�qjpR���GTW�?!�F��a�"�#����������������'���wm[&�
ol��J;pG����(]52B�P�
�[Z\W��{c��0
�z�Wcm�����a��#W[�3meW,�l�!�8�\/xJ���{����MQ�^n�;6`���ac�b,���9�\����N6��C��E�MT*�d����4�A��Q~(M5����|:�
u!�]Ed���<�-�3����"#��?�t;���4�W�%�~�9����i3���O���h\6
��:wB��`-����?�����[���o��;[[����5
��$�J8�C�9���$��x�%<J��xS,����a�d�
�!�W�
A��;����~'}�����
24������(B;�� �X�����X;s(wVcW��������<��7���Z��O�)���9��N�e��x��z�5����!���X�.�#���.��kW|���U�N.�����x'/�#GU�Z�$����Rk�.{�>z���5T���)�x?�� ;�L:�����O,rP
FU����;6�c���[���W{�[-����|3[��)%�Km��{v}]\���g���]��.��&���V����[���j�DX����WQ���|B��2��>��8f&�����h���b��^��Mm����I�q��R��E8���Y�������p�U^7��X`y�t�����J�ix8x������#$O�����p�
y�}Ch�p���~�0���C}�)$�`�g�q)��!kr u��Lb�'�y��#�����}R�����y����Ax�T��#C������\�e���&*����E�'*[i�eN�uw7���j�a�t%Yr7���d����:2<�MqR<8���T����5�����91
�\��b�����(3V�e���b6�W��#�l��!F�g�K|Y�OQ%�<GP������E������
��r��K������:�������5VY������*d��j�$�}O��U`���j������'�q����'�/
��q%�D�h�e�� ������gWB�Sjgar������������*1v�oJ>t�JVV�z�2�T���f���c�`H��r�3�&�����-9
�1T����0���~�tf�s�Q��u�E���t�Z%����L�8��)��
����c��P��
�% VY!)�:,q�c?�u����
��������|�I�V���L�
.������(J�!Sz����W�y_dY�����x/g����{�z�E�N����0���x����INm��!^P}��;g�������2��jm�r�-����n�����1�>j���KWh|�Q����M�[��Ys��V4m��E�%>���/�����ls$����)H��SR��g��{��c��8������xw�A�]�Bn���G�D"�t�)�xD'f9Zw
��.�G��LOHEK�����Hb��X3g%�9R�Q_�`������^Y9 �3�n�u����A��/������j����ns�Q>������I���/�����:R�y�|��rK�9g}q&$��:�?z�j�"�./����'��:h�{�K�YT���6���K��T���D(����I������"��DI�Y�`�r����0�����<s]�]�l��H�"��n��d�Z��MS����_������{:�~��k��H�r.?n�,B
{M�������g��!���o��w��[�
�
tx/F[C:��1��a������j�[��������XJ^2�������.�7L���S����<[_C����2���S�:n�i"��]�
c[�w
(%�Q��3�����b#���Dm��/S������f�}R�#�����������g���0��_\:f�a������k�j���q��W��5i��p���)wq��t���c����l���!���$(�����(�������\|S���y�h�[�^h��
15 years, 4 months