On 12 Oct 2006, at 18:01, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
Never underestimate people's stupidity, like me for example. On a
more
serious note, can this pooling be isolated and then use interchangable
pooling implementations? How does hibernate make it interchangable?
They
must be using some adaptation layer?
My main point is to see what they have done and not reinvent the
wheel.
I don't think we need that degree of sophistication (==
complication). Just embed a simple conn pooling library and use it.
If people want more flexibility, use an appserver with a conn pool.
What do you think?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manik Surtani [mailto:manik@jboss.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:53 PM
> To: Vladimir Blagojevic
> Cc: jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Subject: Re: [jbosscache-dev] Using Apache DBCP in
> NonManagedConnectionFactory
>
> I doubt anyone would use a cache loader if JBC is a cache for
> Hibernate. :-)
>
> This is more for standalone cases, not even within an app
> server since then the app server would provide db conn pooling.
> --
> Manik Surtani
>
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
> Email: manik(a)jboss.org
> Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
> MSN: manik(a)surtani.org
> Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani