Re: [jbosscache-dev] Naming discussion
On 11 Aug 2006, at 12:17, Ben Wang wrote:
Guys (and Manik, secifically),
I have been in the process of updating the PojoCache documentation
for 2.0 release. One thing that came up that I'd like to solicit
some inputs. As we all agreed that PojoCache will still be housed
under JBoss Cache (alhtough may have two separate distributions).
That is, JBoss Cache will have two cache libararies per se. Now we
know one component is PojoCache. How do we call the other component
(with Cache implementation)? We used to call it TreeCache that is
more distinguished than simply Cache, IMO.
I agree that Cache vs. PojoCache is less distinct than TreeCache vs.
PojoCache, but at the end of the day we're trying to define a product
that does a single task of caching data. As you said, PojoCache
builds on top of this to add Pojo/AOP based features, so one may
argue that Cache vs. PojoCache, while being less distinct, is in fact
more correct.
FYI, in 2.0, PojoCache will use a delegate to the Cache
implementation. Actually, there will be two seprate configuration
xml files. One is for the Cache and the other for PojoCache. So we
can say PojoCache is a layer on top but not a sub-class anymore.
Thanks,
-Ben
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev