Re: [jbosscache-dev] Anycast: JBCACHE-813 & JGRP-338

Mid-next week? I have something I need to debug on that branch anyway, which I hope to do on Mon/Tue. And then Wed to give things a sanity check, test everything, etc. So if I can have it for Wed it would be great. That said, I need to see if I need to hold out for JBCACHE-315. Let's see after the TCK call today, since that will help determine whether 1.4.1 goes into AS 4.2. Cheers, -- Manik Surtani Lead, JBoss Cache JBoss, a division of Red Hat Email: manik(a)jboss.org Telephone: +44 7786 702 706 MSN: manik(a)surtani.org Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani On 1 Dec 2006, at 08:39, Bela Ban wrote: > How long can you hold it ? > > Manik Surtani wrote: >> +1. I can hold 1.4.1.CR for this next release of JGroups. >> >> Much preferred route for me. :-) >> --Manik Surtani >> >> Lead, JBoss Cache >> JBoss, a division of Red Hat >> >> Email: manik(a)jboss.org >> Telephone: +44 7786 702 706 >> MSN: manik(a)surtani.org >> Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani >> >> >> >> On 29 Nov 2006, at 09:42, Bela Ban wrote: >> >>> No. You'll send out the same request to *all* members, then wait >>> for all replies. At least that's how I will do it in anycast as >>> part of JGroups. >>> Hmm, no, you are actually right ! Okay, so let's leave the >>> JBossCache impl untouched and wait for JGroups 2.5 then. I can cut >>> a release in a week from now if you want. >>> >>> Brian Stansberry wrote: >>>> Re: making multiple unicast calls from the JBC layer, doesn't this >>>> likely increase the overall time to do the group RPC by putting each >>>> call/response in series? You lose JGroups' ability to correlate the >>>> responses. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --Bela Ban >>> Lead JGroups / JBoss Clustering team >>> JBoss - a division of Red Hat >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosscache-dev mailing list >>> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev >> >> >> > > --Bela Ban > Lead JGroups / JBoss Clustering team > JBoss - a division of Red Hat >