I haven't seen people complaining about binary compatibility when upgrading from 2.2.x to 2.3.x. They're seem to be always be happy about upgrading all their JBC instances in the cluster (and JGroups as well). So, +1 here Galder Zamarreño Sr. Software Maintenance Engineer JBoss, a division of Red Hat -----Original Message----- From: jbosscache-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:jbosscache-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Manik Surtani Sent: 01 November 2006 18:03 To: jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Subject: [jbosscache-dev] JBoss Cache 1.4.1 && JGroups 2.4? What do people feel about shipping JBC 141 with JG 24? Currently JBC 140 ships with JG 2.2.9.2. Thoughts? -- Manik Surtani Lead, JBoss Cache JBoss, a division of Red Hat Email: manik(a)jboss.org Telephone: +44 7786 702 706 MSN: manik(a)surtani.org Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani _______________________________________________ jbosscache-dev mailing list jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev