++1
Galder ZamarreƱo
Support Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
-----Original Message-----
From: jbosscache-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:jbosscache-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Manik Surtani
Sent: 11 September 2006 18:40
To: Brian Stansberry
Cc: jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: [jbosscache-dev] Re: Logging jars
I was trying it out as per our discussions on dev.
Also, I think it is best to have version numbers on such jars just so
we're clear on what versions we're using (I couldn't tell which
version of JCL we had before, for example)
What does everyone think about version numbers in the jars we use,
like this?
Cheers,
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Email: manik(a)jboss.org
Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
MSN: manik(a)surtani.org
Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
On 11 Sep 2006, at 18:29, Brian Stansberry wrote:
Hey dude,
Looks like you checked in commons-logging-1.1.jar and
log4j-1.2.13.jar.
Was this intentional? These files have a different name from
what's in
the Eclipse project classpath, so that breaks Eclipse. I can check
in a
fixed Eclipse .classpath file, but don't want to if you're going to
revert the library change.
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev