Yes, but replaced with some other interaction with the JGroups layer,
which again won't be directly exposed via CacheSPI.
Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
But this stuff will be removed anyway as soon as we have
partial state transfer in place, correct?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manik Surtani [mailto:manik@jboss.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 11:48 AM
> To: Brian Stansberry
> Cc: Ben Wang; Vladimir Blagojevic; Manik Surtani;
> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Subject: Re: [jbosscache-dev] CacheSPI.setStateTransferManager
>
> It should call CacheSPI.getRPCManager().callRemote...
>
>
> On 19 Sep 2006, at 16:31, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>
>>
>> StateTransferManager invokes TreeCache.callRemoteMethods, which I
>> can't imagine being added to CacheSPI. There may be other methods
>> as well. It has a public getter/setter for the cache that
>> subclasses can use.
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Ph: 510-396-3864
skype: bstansberry