Galder Zamarreno wrote: > Hi, > > I'm about to fix https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBCACHE-1465 to > make sure we don't encounter Thread name issues when using Cache > instances in LOCAL mode but I wanted to raise the following: > > In clustered mode, cluster name allows for each cache instance to be > distinguished individually but when it comes to LOCAL mode, there's > not a cache name as such, so if you had N LOCAL caches in a server, > how would you differentiate from one another when trying to search for > that instance in your JMX console? > > I think we could do with a cache name in general rather than limiting > us to a cluster name which by extension is used as the cache name in a > replicated environment. > > Thoughts? I don't think the "generate name" logic even applies after 1.x. Unless I've forgotten something, in 2.0+ a user has to specify the ObjectName.