I've scanned the patch, thanks. I've just one concern, ie. whether it's a bit
too aggressive rewriting a "file://foo-bar" address with one using http
protocol, as theoretically that might refer to a jms binding.
So you might want to enhance the patch a bit scanning the model, getting the binding
corresponding to the address being analysed and verifying the soap:binding in use before
rewriting "file" to "http(s)".
Btw, besides fixing this which is good in anycase, did you try providing an address
without procotol (simply "replace-me" for instance) in your wsdl as a
workaround?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4264983#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...