June 2009 - jbpm-users - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Nested Fork/Joins Doesn't seem to work

by kukeltje

oh, and one more thing, it would be nice if you could reduce the test to a minimal one. Just showing this one issue. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236063#4236063 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236063

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Changing from versioned ActionHandlers

by jeppe.klausen

We've a couple of systems running in production with quite some versions of deployed processes. We've used to deploy these via the Servlet and with all custom action handlers located within each par-file. After have been working this way we would really want to change the way we load action handlers, as we don't want them versioned at all, but rather have them just available in the classpath as this would make our life a bit easier :). Therefore I seek recommendations on: 1. Howto update current/previous deployed versions of processdefinitions to load classes from classpath on filesystem instead from the database 2. Any opinions regarding this approach View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236061#4236061 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236061

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Nested Fork/Joins Doesn't seem to work

by kukeltje

ah, sorry, I missed the thrid time :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236060#4236060 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236060

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Nested Fork/Joins Doesn't seem to work

by kukeltje

nope, not even the second time : -) Use [ c o d e ] [ / c o d e ] tags around it, without the spaces. Ont small thing though. If it is not to much trouble, the example I referred to had everyting in one file. The processdefinition as a string and the actionhandlers as inner classes. That way I only have to create one file, not multiple, with possible typos etc. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236059#4236059 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236059

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Nested Fork/Joins Doesn't seem to work

by philsegal

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Nested Fork/Joins Doesn't seem to work

by philsegal

2nd time lucky... <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <process-definition xmlns="" name="ny-workflow-2"> <start-state name="start-daily-pnl"> </start-state> <task-node name="signoff-pnl">  <assignment config-type="bean" class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler"> pnlSignOffMOAssignmentHandler jbpmConfiguration <action class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler" config-type="bean"> signOffMultiAction jbpmConfiguration  </task-node> <task-node name="propose-adjustments"> <assignment config-type="bean" class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler"> proposeAdjustmentAssignmentHandler jbpmConfiguration <action class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler" config-type="bean"> proposeAdjustmentsAction jbpmConfiguration </task-node> <task-node name="approve-reject-adj"> <assignment config-type="bean" class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler"> approveRejectAdjustmentAssignmentHandler jbpmConfiguration </task-node>  <action class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler" config-type="bean"> rejectAdjustmentsAction jbpmConfiguration <task-node name="review"> <assignment config-type="bean" class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler"> reviewPnlAssignmentHandler jbpmConfiguration <action class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler" config-type="bean"> reviewPnlAction jbpmConfiguration </task-node> <action class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler" config-type="bean"> autoApproveAdjustmentsAction jbpmConfiguration <action class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler" config-type="bean"> approveAdjustmentsAction jbpmConfiguration <action class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler" config-type="bean"> downstreamFeedsAction jbpmConfiguration <task-node name="unsignoff-pnl"> <assignment config-type="bean" class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler"> pnlSignOffMOAssignmentHandler jbpmConfiguration <action config-type="bean" class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler"> unsignoffAction jbpmConfiguration    </task-node> <end-state name="end-daily-pnl"></end-state> </process-definition> View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236038#4236038 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236038

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Nested Fork/Joins Doesn't seem to work

by philsegal

Thanks, Junit and jbpm xml file are below. package com.jpmorgan.orion.workflow.ny; import org.jbpm.graph.def.ProcessDefinition; import org.jbpm.graph.exe.ProcessInstance; import org.junit.Test; import com.jpmorgan.orion.workflow.service.BaseManagerTestCase; /** * Phil Segal * @date @14 May 2009 */ public class JoinsTest extends BaseManagerTestCase { @Test public void testNoAdjustments() throws Exception { ProcessDefinition def = ProcessDefinition.parseXmlResource("workflow/ny-workflow-2/processdefinition.xml"); assertNotNull("Definition should not be null", def); ProcessInstance instance = new ProcessInstance(def); assertEquals("Def should be at start", "start-daily-pnl", instance.getRootToken().getNode().getName()); instance.signal("default"); instance.getRootToken().getChild("signoff").signal("signoff pnl"); instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").signal("cancel fork1"); assertEquals("Def should be at auto approve", "auto-signoff-adj", instance.getRootToken().getNode().getName() ); instance.signal("leave-asa"); assertEquals("Def should be at ds feeds", "downstream-feeds", instance.getRootToken().getNode().getName()); instance.signal("leave-dsf"); assertEquals("Def should be at fork 3", "fork3", instance.getRootToken().getNode().getName()); instance.getRootToken().getChild("reviewed").signal("review"); instance.getRootToken().getChild("unsignoff").signal("cancel"); // instance.signal(); assertTrue("Instance has ended", instance.hasEnded()); } @Test public void testWithAdjustmentsProcessNoApprove() throws Exception { ProcessDefinition def = ProcessDefinition.parseXmlResource("workflow/ny-workflow-2/processdefinition.xml"); assertNotNull("Definition should not be null", def); ProcessInstance instance = new ProcessInstance(def); assertEquals("Def should be at start", "start-daily-pnl", instance.getRootToken().getNode().getName()); instance.signal("default"); instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").signal("propose an adjustment"); assertEquals("Def should be at fork2", "fork2", instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getNode().getName()); instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("propose").signal("cancel"); instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("approve").signal("cancel"); assertEquals("child should be at join1", "join1", instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getNode().getName()); assertEquals("parent should be at fork1", "fork1", instance.getRootToken().getNode().getName()); instance.getRootToken().getChild("signoff").signal("signoff pnl"); assertEquals("Def should be at auto approve", "auto-signoff-adj", instance.getRootToken().getNode().getName() ); } @Test public void testWithMultipleAdjustmentsProcessNoApprove() throws Exception { ProcessDefinition def = ProcessDefinition.parseXmlResource("workflow/ny-workflow-2/processdefinition.xml"); assertNotNull("Definition should not be null", def); ProcessInstance instance = new ProcessInstance(def); assertEquals("Def should be at start", "start-daily-pnl", instance.getRootToken().getNode().getName()); instance.signal("default"); instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").signal("propose an adjustment"); assertEquals("Def should be at fork2", "fork2", instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getNode().getName()); instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("propose").signal("propose an adjustment"); // Use either just cancel, or both approve and default signals for approve signalling... // instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("approve").signal("cancel"); instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("approve").signal("approve"); instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("approve").signal("default"); instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("propose").getChild("propose").signal("cancel"); instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("propose").getChild("approve").signal("cancel"); assertEquals("propose/propose should be at join1", "join1", instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("propose").getNode().getName()); assertEquals("propose/approve should be at join2", "join2", instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("approve").getNode().getName()); assertEquals("parent should be at fork1", "fork1", instance.getRootToken().getNode().getName()); assertEquals("propose should be at join1", "join1", instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getNode().getName()); instance.getRootToken().getChild("signoff").signal("signoff pnl"); assertEquals("signoff should be at join1", "join1", instance.getRootToken().getChild("signoff").getNode().getName()); // instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("propose").getChild("propose").signal("cancel"); // instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("propose").getChild("propose").signal("propose an adjustment"); // instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("propose").getChild("propose").getChild("propose").signal("cancel fork1"); // instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("propose").getChild("approve").signal("cancel fork1"); // instance.getRootToken().getChild("propose").getChild("propose").getChild("propose").getChild("approve").signal("cancel fork1"); assertEquals("Def should be at auto approve", "auto-signoff-adj", instance.getRootToken().getNode().getName() ); } } ____________________________________________________ processdefinition <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <process-definition xmlns="" name="ny-workflow-2"> <start-state name="start-daily-pnl"> </start-state> <task-node name="signoff-pnl">  <assignment config-type="bean" class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler"> pnlSignOffMOAssignmentHandler jbpmConfiguration <action class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler" config-type="bean"> signOffMultiAction jbpmConfiguration  </task-node> <task-node name="propose-adjustments"> <assignment config-type="bean" class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler"> proposeAdjustmentAssignmentHandler jbpmConfiguration <action class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler" config-type="bean"> proposeAdjustmentsAction jbpmConfiguration </task-node> <task-node name="approve-reject-adj"> <assignment config-type="bean" class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler"> approveRejectAdjustmentAssignmentHandler jbpmConfiguration </task-node>  <action class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler" config-type="bean"> rejectAdjustmentsAction jbpmConfiguration <task-node name="review"> <assignment config-type="bean" class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler"> reviewPnlAssignmentHandler jbpmConfiguration <action class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler" config-type="bean"> reviewPnlAction jbpmConfiguration </task-node> <action class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler" config-type="bean"> autoApproveAdjustmentsAction jbpmConfiguration <action class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler" config-type="bean"> approveAdjustmentsAction jbpmConfiguration <action class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler" config-type="bean"> downstreamFeedsAction jbpmConfiguration <task-node name="unsignoff-pnl"> <assignment config-type="bean" class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler"> pnlSignOffMOAssignmentHandler jbpmConfiguration <action config-type="bean" class="org.springmodules.workflow.jbpm31.JbpmHandler"> unsignoffAction jbpmConfiguration    </task-node> <end-state name="end-daily-pnl"></end-state> </process-definition> View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236034#4236034 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236034

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Finding outgoing transitions - jBPM 4

by DrBr

Hello, I get a reference to my process instance as: ProcessInstance pi = executionService.findProcessInstanceById("__MY_ID_HERE__"); First a confirmation... Is it correct to assume that I get the current state on which my process is at using: pi.findActiveActivityNames() ? I understand that in case of parallel execution, via a fork, I should be getting more than one elements here? And a question... How can I find the list of available outgoing transitions for the particular activity on which my process instance is currently at? I see there is an Activity class that can give me that info, but can't find a way to get a reference to an Activity object via pi.findActiveActivityNames(). Any suggestions please? thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236029#4236029 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236029

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: how generate image for a process definitions file in jpd

by maruthi.sura

thanks for help and support. Thanks & Regards Maruthi View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235874#4235874 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235874

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Nested Fork/Joins Doesn't seem to work

by kukeltje

if you have the unittest, please post it. Then I can see what you do instead of guessing or reading text ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235864#4235864 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235864

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-users June 2009