June 2009 - jbpm-users - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Desperately seeking 3.1.4 -> 3.2.3 migration notes

by tmuldo＠firstbest.com

Jobs that already ran do not run again. Here's the link to the jira... https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2308 Thanks for your help, Tom View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235858#4235858 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235858

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Nested Fork/Joins Doesn't seem to work

by philsegal

Im not sure whether the signalling of tasks ie task.signal has the save behaviour as the direct signalling on the token object. Also, is the token object uniquely identified by something other than its name? ie its path parent/child? I am trying to work out thru junits what the constraints are, but it doesnt seem to be limited to fully nested f/j's. It is all rather bizarre. Since, I have managed to see that all child tokens of a parent token are at the join, yet the parent is still at the fork. I didnt think that this should happed. Finally, I have seen instances where the child tokens go past the join, yet the parent token is still at the fork... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235854#4235854 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235854

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Nested Fork/Joins Doesn't seem to work

by kukeltje

If you manually signal tokens, a non fully nested fork/join might work, but that behaviour is not guaranteed to stay/be the same over versions. What do you mean by 'how task signalling works'? You end a task and the token continues if the other attributes on the task node allow it to. By default, ending the task makes it take the specified transition. So nothing special to it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235853#4235853 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235853

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Nested Fork/Joins Doesn't seem to work

by philsegal

It seems that within my Junit test i can have non-fully contained fork/joins, and that provided i get the correct child token (and childs-child etc) to signal, then it works succesfully. Is there any documentation on how taskInstance signalling works? Since I think maybe the problem is more to do with the taskInstance signal, than the token signal. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235850#4235850 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235850

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Nested Fork/Joins Doesn't seem to work

by kukeltje

yes, that is what fully contained/nested means.... Regarding do's/dont's, this is the most important one, together with 'do not loop for polling the existence of a file' kind of things. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235849#4235849 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235849

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Nested Fork/Joins Doesn't seem to work

by philsegal

Hi, Thanks for the feedback, I will build the junit and get back to you, tho i may have spotted something. Do the internal fork/joins have to be totally self contained? At the moment I have transitions from within the internal f/j that goes to the outer one. Would this cause the issue? Is there anywhere to find a definitive do's/dont's list? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235840#4235840 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235840

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: how generate image for a process definitions file in jpd

by kukeltje

The 4.0 CR1 designer is part of the normal release: jbpm-4.0.CR1.zip View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235839#4235839 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235839

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Nested Fork/Joins Doesn't seem to work

by kukeltje

Should work. Can you make a unittest that demonstrates the problem? Please make the unittest like: http://fisheye.jboss.com/browse/~raw,r=4398/JbpmSvn/jbpm3/trunk/modules/c... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235838#4235838 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235838

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Desperately seeking 3.1.4 -> 3.2.3 migration notes

by kukeltje

well, since you are part of the jBPM 'community', and you confirmed it works when changing 0 to 1, you might file a Jira issue. That is the way the 'jBPM group' is notified and take action. When that is done, I'll be more than happy to update the release notes. One question though. Jobs that already ran do not run again, right? Please mention that in the jira issue as well View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235836#4235836 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235836

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Decision & Exclusive in jBPM 4

by Setya

Hi all, I've found the term Decision & Exclusive in jBPM 4, are they meant to be the same ? Regards, Setya View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235789#4235789 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4235789

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-users June 2009