1: maybe because the db is different?
2: Everything on SF should be regarded as out-of-date I think. There indeed was an issue
which was fixed in newer 3.2.x releases (afaik)
3: I've heard something like this before. Not realy sure, but it might require manual
changes to those values.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235502#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...