That I don't know, sorry! Maybe have a look at the drools JIRA page, see if
the issue has been discussed?
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:10 PM, cwolfinger <chase.wolfinger(a)gmail.com>wrote:
Yes. But the collection I am testing has Integer objects it is the object
of
the comparison for containment that is an int primitive. So my thoughts
are
if this would never work unless I use an eval then why does the rules
parser
allow the creation of condition that is invalid?
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Question-on-contains-operator-with-integer-tp440559p...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Enda J Diggins