Re: [rules-users] Possibly Broken drools-core-5.4.0.Final.jar?

Hi Darin, I've been just able to reproduce the bug you reported and opened a JIRA ticket for it: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3568 In particular the problem is in the evaluation of the constraint: "value/predictedValue >= 0.7" where both value and predictedValue are fields of your class AbstractDoubleFinding with the particularity that while the first is a primitive double the second is of type Double. For sure this is a bug and I am going to fix it, but as temporary workaround I'd suggest you, if possible, to also declare predictedValue as a primitive double in order of being sure that you won't have null values on it ... even because I couldn't say if 0.0/null is less or greater than 0.7 ;) Thanks for reporting this, Mario -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Possibly-Broken-drools-core... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users