4:55 a.m.
Assuming a normal scenario, where a rule evaluates multiple variable and gets
fired, if the rule did not get fired then how will I know which variable did
not qualify or resulted in rejection of that rule and also what value of the
variable caused that? I need to error out the variable and the value that
resulted in not firing a rule.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/For-Rule-not-firing%21-tp20433114p20433114.html
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
6:44 a.m.
New subject: sequencial rules
Dear All,
I need to run about 10 rules sequentially.
When it comes up to 4th rule it modifies the fact. But it should only
re-activate only the 5th rule onwards. Already ran rules(1,2 and 3[anyway
4th wont run when you set no-loop to true]) should be intact.
How can I do this?
Pls HELP
9:01 a.m.
New subject: sequencial rules
Check out the lock-on-active flag. That may be of help here.
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Kapila Silwathge
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 11:14 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: [rules-users] sequencial rules
Dear All,
I need to run about 10 rules sequentially.
When it comes up to 4th rule it modifies the fact. But it should only
re-activate only the 5th rule onwards. Already ran rules(1,2 and 3[anyway
4th wont run when you set no-loop to true]) should be intact.
How can I do this?
Pls HELP
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
MASTEK LTD.
Mastek is in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20' Software Service Exporters List.
In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that of Mastek
Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited does not accept any
responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with
it are confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or
entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use
of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been
scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to
run the virus check on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received
this e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
9:22 a.m.
New subject: sequencial rules
no...:-) i tried it .......it prevent activation.........requirement is to
activations to take effect only to the rest of the rules.....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vikrant Yagnick" <VikrantY(a)mastek.com>
To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 1:31 PM
Subject: RE: [rules-users] sequencial rules
Check out the lock-on-active flag. That may be of help here.
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Kapila Silwathge
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 11:14 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: [rules-users] sequencial rules
Dear All,
I need to run about 10 rules sequentially.
When it comes up to 4th rule it modifies the fact. But it should only
re-activate only the 5th rule onwards. Already ran rules(1,2 and 3[anyway
4th wont run when you set no-loop to true]) should be intact.
How can I do this?
Pls HELP
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
MASTEK LTD.
Mastek is in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20' Software Service Exporters List.
In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that
of Mastek Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek
Limited does not accept any responsibility or liability for it. This
e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with it are confidential
and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or entity
to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or
other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. This
e-mail and its attachments have been scanned for the presence of computer
viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to run the virus check
on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received this
e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
10:40 a.m.
New subject: sequencial rules
sounds like you need 2 agenda-groups/ruleflow-groups, rules 1-4 will have
one agenda group, rules 5-X will have other agenda-group, the 4th rule's
consequence will set the focus to the other agenda-grouphope this helps
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Kapila Silwathge <kapila(a)roomsnet.com>wrote:
Dear All,
I need to run about 10 rules sequentially.
When it comes up to 4th rule it modifies the fact. But it should only
re-activate only the 5th rule onwards. Already ran rules(1,2 and 3[anyway
4th wont run when you set no-loop to true]) should be intact.
How can I do this?
Pls HELP
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
2:04 p.m.
New subject: sequencial rules
You can add an instance of Integer or an extension of Integer, perhaps
a class called StateId, to working memory. Initially set it to1. Add a
condition to each rule to test if the StateId is equal to each rule's
order in the sequence. Add a statement to the action part of each rule
to increment the StateId.
This is a general technique that can be used to manage transitions in a
state machine. The condition parts of rules use StateId to tell which
state the rules apply to and the rest of the condition parts determine
whether to transition to another state or not. The action parts of the
rules modify StateId to execute the transition.
Kapila Silwathge [11/11/2008 12:44 AM] wrote:
Dear All,
I need to run about 10 rules sequentially.
When it comes up to 4th rule it modifies the fact. But it should only
re-activate only the 5th rule onwards. Already ran rules(1,2 and
3[anyway 4th wont run when you set no-loop to true]) should be intact.
How can I do this?
Pls HELP
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
2:46 p.m.
New subject: sequencial rules
Is the no-loop attribute not working in this case?
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Kapila Silwathge <kapila(a)roomsnet.com>wrote:
Dear All,
I need to run about 10 rules sequentially.
When it comes up to 4th rule it modifies the fact. But it should only
re-activate only the 5th rule onwards. Already ran rules(1,2 and 3[anyway
4th wont run when you set no-loop to true]) should be intact.
How can I do this?
Pls HELP
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
7:27 a.m.
New subject: sequencial rules
thank u all............i found a way not to modify the facts for this particular
situation..........
----- Original Message -----
From: David Sinclair
To: Rules Users List
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [rules-users] sequencial rules
Is the no-loop attribute not working in this case?
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Kapila Silwathge <kapila(a)roomsnet.com> wrote:
Dear All,
I need to run about 10 rules sequentially.
When it comes up to 4th rule it modifies the fact. But it should only re-activate
only the 5th rule onwards. Already ran rules(1,2 and 3[anyway 4th wont run when you set
no-loop to true]) should be intact.
How can I do this?
Pls HELP
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
7:28 p.m.
Hi kapila,
You nicely hijacked my thread and posted your question below my question :)
good.. that you got some replies too and myself none.
Now, if anybody is interested then plz take a look at the question I had
posted.
vanshi wrote:
Assuming a normal scenario, where a rule evaluates multiple variable and
gets fired, if the rule did not get fired then how will I know which
variable did not qualify or resulted in rejection of that rule and also
what value of the variable caused that? I need to error out the variable
and the value that resulted in not firing a rule.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/For-Rule-not-firing%21-tp20433114p20445460.html
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
11:39 p.m.
vanshi wrote:
Hi kapila,
You nicely hijacked my thread and posted your question below my question :)
good.. that you got some replies too and myself none.
Now, if anybody is interested then plz take a look at the question I had
posted.
vanshi wrote:
> Assuming a normal scenario, where a rule evaluates multiple variable and
> gets fired, if the rule did not get fired then how will I know which
> variable did not qualify or resulted in rejection of that rule and also
> what value of the variable caused that? I need to error out the variable
> and the value that resulted in not firing a rule.
>
Use the audit log, it shows you what activations occur as a result of
which working memory actions. The examples docs has lots of work
throughs showing how to use it.
Mark
>
9:56 p.m.
AFAIK it is not possible, although it will be very useful especially when
you're writing a rule and trying to figure out why it isn't firing
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 3:55 AM, vanshi <nilu.thakur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Assuming a normal scenario, where a rule evaluates multiple variable and
gets
fired, if the rule did not get fired then how will I know which variable
did
not qualify or resulted in rejection of that rule and also what value of
the
variable caused that? I need to error out the variable and the value that
resulted in not firing a rule.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/For-Rule-not-firing%21-tp20433114p20433114.html
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
5648
days inactive
5651
days old
10 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
David Sinclair -
Kapila Silwathge -
Mark Proctor -
Michal Bali -
Scott Reed -
vanshi -
Vikrant Yagnick