If I declare a type in a drl and reference the attributes in a rule then all is fine for either dialect. But, if one of the attributes is a java class that has been compiled and inserted then under the java dialect only I get a compilation error: rule compilation error the field ... is not visible for example declare DroolsTransaction ORG : String PRODUCT : String raw : Transaction end rule "create classes" salience 100 when $t : Transaction() then insert(new DroolsTransaction((String)$t.fieldFor("ORG"), (String)$t.fieldFor("PRODUCT"), $t)); end I insert Transaction objects in the session and this works fine for the following rule if I have the dialect set to mvel. rule "1" when $t : DroolsTransaction(ORG == "A" , PRODUCT == "001", raw.complicated()) then do something end but when I switch dialects to java, the compilation complains that raw is not visible. I guess drools is dynamically creating the DroolsTransaction object with private fields... and I need public accessors - how to define them? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/java-dialect-and-declared-types-tp40278... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

will do, although complicated() has parameters and so I think I'll only able to try getRaw.complicated() -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/java-dialect-and-declared-types-tp40278... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Davide Sottara wrote > Declared types have public accessors as usual. > This seems a minor bug in the expression analysis. > Can you try > > getRaw().complicated() > > and / or > > raw.complicated > > and report what happens? > Thanks > Davide getRaw().complicated() works. This isn't just in the constraint. I use raw in the "then" also and it needs changing to getRaw() also. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/java-dialect-and-declared-types-tp40278... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Thanks, This was just for a performance test to check mvel against java. Mvel in our case is quicker. The tests also show that 5.5.0 is quicker than 6.0.0. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/java-dialect-and-declared-types-tp40278... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Also there will be no performance games for rule bases that do not have joins