If the requirement is to control the order of execution of the rules
then (to quote Dr. EF-H) you probably are using a hammer when you
needed a screwdriver. Meaning that you are trying to use a rulebase
for a procedural problem. There are many times that a rulebase should
NOT be use and this sounds like one of the main examples of that
However, if you absolutely, positively insist on using a rulebase,
then just give each rule a specificity or priority and they will fire
in that order.
"This above all: to thine own self be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man."
Hamlet, Act 1, Scene III
[You can also replyTo: jco(a)kbsc.com]
On Jul 8, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Corneil du Plessis wrote:
If you want to control the order of execution or rules you will have
to look into agendas or ruleflow.
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 15:36 +0530, Amila Silva wrote:
> I have requirement to execute a chain of rules. One rule after
> another and they are reusable.I need to know how to call another
> drl file from a drl file. or in a then part of the
> a rule.
> Amila Silva
> rules-users mailing list
rules-users mailing list