Re: [seam-dev] XML Configuration of producer fields
Agreed, this would be very useful.
The only (practical) issue I see is that Weld currently doesn't expect AnnotatedTtypes
to be respected for EE-style injection (in some/all cases). I suspect that it should (nb.
this is large a change in the container integration contract).
On 24 Aug 2010, at 09:39, Stuart Douglas wrote:
I think that seam-xml needs to ability to programatically add
resource (and other) producer fields. My proposed syntax is:
<s:EntityManager>
<s:producerField/>
<s:PersistenceContext unitName="customer" />
<my:CustomerDatasource/>
</s:EntityManager>
which would be equivalent to:
@Produces
@PersistenceContext(unitName="main")
@CustomerDatasource
EntityManager entityManager;
This will also support other types of producer fields, such as weld extension generic
bean producer fields and primitives:
<s:String>
<s:producerField/>
<my:ApplicationVersion />
<s:value>3.0.0.GA</s:value>
</s:String>
I think it should be:
<ee:EntityManager>
<ee:Produces />
<ee:PersistenceContext unitName="customer" />
<my:CustomerDatasource/>
</ee:EntityManager>
What was the reason for introducing the special producerField keyword?