Re: [seam-dev] laying the tracks for Seam 3

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: On 21 Apr 2009, at 22:17, Jay Balunas wrote: >>>> faces (which would have page actions, faces messages, and >>>> perhaps engulf the current ui too) >>> Sounds good. We should impl page actions on top of JSF2 events I >>> think. FacesMessages aren't needed as they are now stored in the >>> flashscope by default. >> Pete - We had talked about having the ui component being separate >> from seam core and not depend on it. This would allow application >> to who are not using seam to take advantage of the ui component. >> This came up a while back in a discussion about the RichFaces >> validation components and moving them to seam-ui. > >> Would this current approach satisfy that? > Yes. As I keep saying "there is no Seam core" in Seam 3 - all > modules will *just* depend on any JSR-299 impl :-) But you are > actually asking "Can the faces module degrade gracefully such that > what can be used in a plain JSF2 environment - no 299 - works" I > think? I misspoke regarding seam-core :-( I really mean depending on any other seam classes in other modules ( including 299). If we are going to migrate some RichFaces components to seam-ui. I just want to make sure we don't end up requiring users to include X # of seam modules, and/or 299. iirc - I think we were discussing some of the bean validation code. We should discuss other components as well.

-- Pete Muir http://www.seamframework.org http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete -- blog: http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Jay