Re: [seam-dev] Seam 2.1.2 release

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen < max.andersen(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: My concern here is that we really didn't give the community any warning. Granted, the idea of the community release is to test out these things, but still, I think we should either go with a dual-naming release (so have both) or we use .GA and announce that 2.2.0 will be w/o the .GA. It really isn't going to break Maven 2. If anything, the .GA was breaking Maven 2 conventions because most projects just have a numeric version. But going back to my first point, there could be a lot of scripts out there that are appending .GA to a version number loaded from a property because they assume that JBoss adds this extension when doing a final release. -Dan -- Dan Allen Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a week, it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if you feel that it did not reach my attention.