Re: [seam-dev] SAF (aka Entity Framework) idea in Seam 3

Yeah, I agree that being declarative is the ideal. let's say no to inheritance with generics! hehehe. On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 15:36, José Rodolfo Freitas < > joserodolfo.freitas(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> What I like most in CDI and Seam3 is that it's very easy to keep things >> simple and that's something I strongly advocate. > > > +1 > > >> Of course there're still boilerplate code, but I think it's minimal >> (compared to the JEE generations before), and that's something forge can >> create without the need to satisfy a "framework". Yes, I admitedly am afraid >> of that word. >> > > That's fine, it doesn't have to be a framework. I do think there is room > for having some common scaffolding, though. If we can do that by extending > the programming model (annotations, generic beans or interfaces) so that > it's declarative, that's probably ideal. > > I suggest that we brainstorm proposals using gists ( > http://gist.github.com). That will get the ball rolling. We can start > with the idea Jason posted, or feel free to take a different approach. > > -Dan > > -- > Dan Allen > Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action > Registered Linux User #231597 > > http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about > http://mojavelinux.com > http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction > >