Re: [seam-dev] Issues with testing and emma

Hi john, aslak provided us an extension to integrate arquillian with jacoco. https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-jacoco we´ve been testing it and it´s working well. Emma uses offline bytecode instrumentation, and this could be a really hellish to analyzes coverage data over the container. I believe that the best approach in our case (using arquillian) would be On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:19 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > I just noticed this morning that emma reports very low code coverage on my > code.  However, when I switch the injection points from say "SomeBean" to > "SomeBeanImpl" then my code coverage sudden jumps up.  I expect it to be > higher.  It seems like Emma has some issues dealing with CDI proxies, or > possibly arquillian.  Has anyone else noticed this? > > John > > _______________________________________________ > seam-dev mailing list > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > >