Good idea!
Or something like either:
<version>[3.0.0.Beta2,3.0.1)</version>
or
<version>[3.0.0.Beta2,3.1)</version>
That way breaking changes if bound to a version increment, would then
require modules to re-release.
Brian
On 01/28/2011 03:25 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
Have we considered using version range specifiers via the maven
artifact syntax?
If modules used something like:
<version>[3.0.0.Beta2,)</version>
It would allow more flexibility as we go along / upgrade individual
modules. This way we wouldn't need to re-release *everything* when we
re-release *one* thing. WDYT? I'm sure there are consequences, but
others may have ideas too.
~Lincoln