Re: [seam-dev] Mercurial vs GIT

Another strong point for using GIT is the Gerrit source review system. It makes contributing patches easier, and much more: it makes _applying_ those contributions even easier. LieGrue, strub --- Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; schrieb am Mi, 25.11.2009: > Von: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; > Betreff: Re: [seam-dev] Mercurial vs GIT > An: "Daniel Roth" <daniel(a)danielroth.se&gt; > CC: &quot;seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&quot; <seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Datum: Mittwoch, 25. November 2009, 13:43 > I can certainly see that a DVCS might > not be a good fit for closed source / in company software > development. All the work an engineer on the project does is > likely to make it into the project at some point (even if > heavily refactored), and they are unlikely to want to share > it with many other people before it goes into VCS. > > However if you consider Seam, then there are often cases > where someone is maintaining a patch for months or even > years against trunk which they want to easily share with > other users. As we move towards to a more modular approach, > this becomes even more apparent - you might want to develop > a module outside the Seam master, and share it with the > community. At some point we might add it to the master. I > believe a DVCS is ideally suited to this. > > Pete > > On 24 Nov 2009, at 22:22, Daniel Roth wrote: > >> 1) I have not tried GIT... >> 2) Comparing Mercurial and SVN, for me, is like > comparing an nightmare and ease of use. >> >> There is a Mercurial plugin for Eclipse, but it's > really no good. We experienced some bugs at work with it > (DivideByZero), submitted a patch but... Still nothing has > happened... I've tried meld, kdiff3 and the tortoise thingy > for windows, but still I always end up with command line > because things don't work. Also there is really no good way > of branching. Named branches is a MESS so even the hg team > thinks it's better to crete to different clones and then > manually merge them. (See their manual) >> >> One other thing I'd like to say is that having a > distr. repo may sound really fancy, but it's rarely needed. > Although being spread over different offices all over the > world, that feature is never really needed at my work. And > the really really really few times it is, you could just as > well make an ordinary patch, and give it to the other > person. However, there have been many times when hours has > been wasted when trying to resolve issues when two people > have worked in our root repo at the same time. >> >> Just my 10 öre... >> >> Daniel >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Stuart Douglas > <stuart(a)baileyroberts.com.au&gt; > wrote: >> As I understand it GIT support on windows is not good, > and also just having a quick google around it looks like the > tooling support is not very mature either. Also the commands > are different to subversions commands so there is quite a > steep learning curve. >> I like bazaar, it uses the same commands as > subversion, works on all platforms and has eclipse and > windows support. It also has launchpad, which is the bzr > equivalent of github. >> >> Stuart >> ________________________________________ >> From: seam-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org > [seam-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] > On Behalf Of Francisco Jose Peredo [franciscoperedo(a)tabasco.gob.mx] >> Sent: Wednesday, 25 November 2009 1:17 AM >> To: seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> Cc: weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> Subject: Re: [seam-dev] Mercurial vs GIT >> >> I have not tried GIT, but from what I have read it is > pretty complicated >> to learn to use... >> OTOH I have tried Mercurial, which is also > distributed, and found it >> confortable... apparently the >> way it deals with its distribute nature is easier for > subversion users >> to understand... >> AFAIK Netbeans source code is in Mercurial, also > OpenJDK... So it seems >> to work >> well with large code bases... and there are plugins > for Netbeans, >> Eclipse and the Tortoise Hg >> project is advanced and usable... >> Google Code offers free Mercurial hosting... >> Why not Mercurial? >> >> >> >> Pete Muir escribió: >>> A quick item we discussed at the f2f meeting was > whether to switch to >>> GIT for our SCM, rather than SVN. >>> >>> This would give us a IMO a system well suited to > our distribued dev >>> model, it would also make it much easier for > others to sandbox PEs and >>> then contribute them back to us. >>> >>> The proposal is to use Github to host. >>> >>> The team members at devoxx were in favour, but > what do others think? >>> >>> Pete >>> >>> -- >>> Pete Muir >>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete >>> _______________________________________________ >>> seam-dev mailing list >>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dirección Informática de Servicios Financieros >> Dirección General de Modernización e Innovación > Gubernamental >> Secretaría de Administración y Finanzas >> Paseo de la Sierra 435 col. Reforma >> C.P. 86086, Villahermosa, Tabasco. >> Tel. 52 + 993 + 310 40 00 Ext. 7127 >> http://saf.tabasco.gob.mx/ >> >> IMPORTANTE: Esta transmisión electrónica, incluyendo > sus anexos, archivos insertados o "attachments", puede > constituir información confidencial o reservada, en los > términos de la Ley de Acceso a la Información Pública del > Estado de Tabasco, y estar protegida por el derecho > fundamental a la privacidad. Se prohibe el uso de esta > información por cualquier persona distinta al receptor > intencional o previsto. Si usted ha recibibido esta > transmisión electrónica por error, por favor responda > inmediatamente al emisor y borre esta información de su > sistema. El uso, diseminación, distribución o > reproducción de esta transmisión electrónica por > receptores no intencionados o no previstos por el emisor, no > está autorizada y puede considerarse ilícita en los > términos de la legislación penal y civil vigente. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> seam-dev mailing list >> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> seam-dev mailing list >> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Roth >> M.Sc. Computer Science >> daniel(a)danielroth.se >> www.danielroth.se >> +46 736 36 29 46 >> _______________________________________________ >> seam-dev mailing list >> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > seam-dev mailing list > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com