note, because majority of Seam 3 extensions aren't native CDI beans but rather Seam
Solder extensions this is rather crucial to have good tooling for Seam 3....otherwise all
validation and navigation is just very broken.
/max
On Mar 24, 2011, at 13:56, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
Hi,
Talking with Seam/CDI tooling team at EclipseCon and we are still in the dark on how
tooling are supposed to identify CDI extensions that are registered programmatically and
often does not have a beans.xml to "mark" them.
Today we do it by simply scanning jars with *weld*.jar naming pattern (very brittle and
not good for 3rd party extensions).
Furthermore we also have a list of classes to include/exclude since some components in
these jars aren't CDI compliant.
How do we go about identifying these things ?
The idea discussed with Dan/Pete on this topic previously were to add a design-beans.xml
and use that as a marker + list the classes we should load/configure as possible
injection/navigation candidates in the tooling.
I was hoping this were settled before Seam 3 GA but it seem to fallen through the cracks
?
Something I missed ?
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen