>> Ok as Pete said it may have something to do with the new
multi-package
>> support for namespaces. How are you doing the translation?
>
> As described below. We simply do org.jboss.seam.[postcolonname].
> [camelcaseoftagname]
>
> Was told by Gavin et.al. that would be sufficient 99% of the time ;)
>
> I guess we just hit the 1%
So this doesn't work if you define your own namespace? Hmm, this is bad
as people can do that (and clever people will do it a lot), and their
tooling shouldn't tell them it's an error.
Yup, I said that back then but was told "nah - noone will care" so we
moved on ;)
The correct way to do this would be to scan the classpath for
package-
info.class files, load them, and build a map of namespace:package from
the @Namespace annotation on the package, and substitute package for
org.jboss.seam in your above algorithm.
mkay ;)
I'll find the method for Shane and assign an issue in jira for him.
To start with we might just hack around this specific class.
/max
>
>
> /max
>
>>
>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:23:45 +0200, Shane Bryzak
>>> <shane.bryzak(a)jboss.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This attribute was simply moved (from identity to rule-based-
>>>> permission-resolver) in Seam 2.1.0, no library requirements were
>>>> changed for security. Is there a security rules file present, and
>>>> is there a specific exception produced? This change was documented
>>>> in seam21migration.txt in the root of the Seam dist, might be worth
>>>> checking there for any other potentially breaking changes.
>>>
>>> The problem is the missing class...we translate security:rule-
>>> based-permission-resolver to
>>> org.jboss.seam.security.RuleBasedPermissionResolver;
>>> that is apparently not enough anymore for the core tags.
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Walking through jira issues for JBT 3 beta1 and I just stumbled into
>>>>>
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-2702 which is caused by
>>>>> <security:rule-based-permission-resolver security-
>>>>> rules="#{securityRules}"/>
>>>>> now being in components.xml by default.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is for some reason failing for us - probably we are missing a
>>>>> drools jar or something ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Before I start finding these changes in 2.1 that might break
>>>>> current tools behavior the hard way,
>>>>> do you guys got a list of major 2.1 changes that changes lib
>>>>> dependencies/startup sequence etc. ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --/max
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
--
/max