Good. I'm scratching my head about some of my pull requests. JMS is a bit
overly complicated.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp(a)gmail.com>wrote:
No, we didn't assign it to anyone.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 19, 2011, at 16:19, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Was it decided who would take care of the testsuite restructure? I must
> admit I wasn't paying much attention during this discussion ;)
>
> On 19/09/11 23:39, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
>> INTEGRATION TESTS
>>
>> Structure:
>>
>> - api
>> - impl
>> - testsuite / src / test / java
>>
>> Container-specific issues
>> - there will be a BaseDeploymentFactory that creates base deployment
>> based on a system property (arquillian container name)
>> - there will be no common package scheme for now
>>
>> Default profile
>> - weld embedded
>> - skipped tests if weld embedded does not make sense in the context of
>> the module
>>
>>
>> FUNCTIONAL TESTS
>> - m4 will be used to generate pom files from our templates (stored in
>> Seam QA github)
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev