On 18 May 2009, at 19:16, Dan Allen wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On 12 May 2009, at 23:15, Dan Allen wrote:
As we organize Seam 3 and the examples, I find myself asking two
questions:
- Where is JBoss EL hosted and why is it not listed as a project at
jboss.org?
It's never been made a top level project.
I'm suggesting maybe it should.
Are you volunteering to be the maintainer, as we do need one...
An alternative we discussed at some point is to migrate to MVEL which
is supposed to be gaining a Unified EL compatibility mode.
- Why are we not using JBoss EL 2.0? It appears that Norman and Pete
have both tagged a 2.0 release, so why are we not using it?
I altered the numbering scheme at some point to follow EL spec
numbering, not Seam numbering.
Really, we should migrate to the EL RI as soon as it has the
features we need.
It's maintained by us.
I'm not convinced that the EL RI is going to have everything we
want. For one, it does not support projections. Also, the syntax is
a bit quirky still in the RI. I know we want to track the standard,
but I also think that there is still room for extension. Besides,
the fact that the EL is still not a top-level JSR bothers me.
Sure, but we do need someone to maintain it.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than
a week,
it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a
message if
you feel that it did not reach my attention.
--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete