Re: [seam-dev] Interceptor packaging convention
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Agreed, the interceptor is definitely part of the public API - they
have to
reference the class in their beans.xml.
Yep, and beans.xml must be considered "their code" (as a counter to Shane's
point).
Having it in the javadoc is no replacement for a decent ref guide, but can
be useful for some IMO.
Should we have Maven build merge JavaDoc for interceptors and decorators
into the JavaDoc for the api/ module? This should be possible based on name
filtering (i.e., *Interceptor, *Decorator). It will require some build
trickery, though.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.5 KB)