I actually have started two different posts on unit testing, and I'll
try to get them out.
On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:59 AM, John P. A. Verhaeg wrote:
Okay, I'll start to put together a blog about our i18n
framework.
I've noticed recently that we (DNA committers) are starting to
diverge a bit in how we test. Maybe you could blog about some of
the "best practices" we've discussed regarding testing (such as BDD
vs. TDD, conventions, etc.).
Randall Hauch wrote:
> One topic might be the I18n framework. John did a great job
> (improving some stuff that he worked on with Dan a while back) on
> this, and it really is a great little framework. I used to hate
> internationalization code, but now it is very easy to work with.
>
> What do you think, John? You up for it? Could be a multipart
> blog, too. Some questions that could be answered:
>
> • How it's used
> • How it works
> • What are the advantages over other approaches
> • Support for multiple locales (e.g., web application)
> • Caching of localization messages
> • Parameters
> • Updating of localization messages
> • Typed parameters (compile-time)
> • Passing around internationalized messages
> • Extensibility (Localization repository)
> • Testing
> • Why does logging use it (and why debug and trace methods are
> not internationalized)
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Randall
> On Jun 17, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Randall Hauch wrote:
>
>> If you have any suggestions about topics for new blog entries,
>> please feel let us know. And, we're always open to anyone to
>> write some entries.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Randall
>
>