Correct. People would experience it either as an ant task, or perhaps
as a plug in (which can be used in lots of places). So files can be in
both traditional developer SCM and the repository.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Randall Hauch <rhauch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I think it makes sense. You're basically creating a client
library that
does the "SCM-like" operations, and which interacts with the (remote?)
Guvnor repository (server?).
On Apr 8, 2008, at 4:57 PM, Michael Neale wrote:
> We were using SVNKit - but for the moment, we are going to sidestep
> the SVN sync directly (the code we have works, and people are free to
> use it, but we may not).
>
> Instead, we will have a simple remote api for the repository, and have
> a little client lib (and ant task) to allow SCM "like" operations on
> the Guvnor repository. We have also looked at Eclipse team support,
> and its possible to do this in such a way that eclipse knows about it
> (so a file can also be in a regular SVN). This means we are not tied
> to SVN for this feature.
>
> A richer SVN sync would be nice - but as you mentioned once before,
> this is kind of a funciton that DNA/meta matrix could provide as a
> data service, in the future.
>
> Does that make sense? bit hard to explain - happy to chat it out if it
helps.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Randall Hauch <rhauch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for sending this out, Michael. I hope to get started on the
> > federation (especially SCM) capability in the next few weeks, after the
> > initial release goes out the door. Are you using any SVN library that
suits
> > your needs?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Apr 1, 2008, at 9:46 PM, Michael Neale wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2 things:
> > >
> > > * drools-repository (which is just back end code, only depends on
> > > jackrabbit, not web component) to be extracted, and
"genericised" -
> > > this could serve as a very useful test bed for the DNA repository back
> > > end, at the very least, as it excercises all the features that we will
> > > use in the SOA repository - that are needed by JCR (ergo, DNA
> > > repository).
> > >
> > > * Whilst hopefully DNA repository can give us SCM sync ability
> > > (ClearCase, SVN, CVS etc etc) - we are building a component to allow
> > > IDEs, Command line etc to add/list/remove/update content from SOA
> > > repository (like a Very Simple Version System) - so we can edit/SCM
> > > file artifacts in the IDE (eg rules, interface contracts) yet have
> > > them available on the web and managed in the SOA repository (keep devs
> > > and managers happy).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Michael D Neale
> > > home:
www.michaelneale.net
> > > blog:
michaelneale.blogspot.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dna-dev mailing list
> > > dna-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/dna-dev
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Michael D Neale
> home:
www.michaelneale.net
> blog:
michaelneale.blogspot.com
>