-----Original Message----- From: dna-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:dna-dev- bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Randall Hauch Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:58 AM To: JBoss DNA Subject: [dna-dev] Releasing 0.6 During the 0.6 release cycle, we've added a few new features and fixed quite a few issues with the graph library, connectors, and JCR implementation [1]. In fact, a number of the issues required some fairly significant refactoring of the state management components in our JCR implementation. The original 0.6 plan, however, was include a search and query feature. I've made a lot of progress with search/ query, but I still have a few weeks of completing the feature development and integrating it with the connectors and JCR implementation. There are also a number of outstanding issues that we need/want to fix, so I'd guess we're still a month away from the planned 0.6 release. However, a number of people have taken a look at 0.5 recently, and they've run into some of the same issues that we've already fixed. They're currently using trunk, but have asked when the next stable release will be available. We can either continue our current plans, or change our schedule a bit and release 0.6 without the search/query feature (or the fantastic Eclipse publishing plug-in). For the record, we released 0.5 on June 11, and that's just under 3 months

I'm leaning toward releasing 0.6 early and moving the search/query and Eclipse features to the following release (which may actually be a 1.0 candidate). That would require me putting aside the search/query stuff for a few days (maybe a week) so that I can focus on fixing a number of the more critical and high-priority issues (we still have a few TCK regressions that we should fix before releasing) and

editing the documentation. But I think it's worth it so that we can get another much more stable release out the door for people to use. Please share your thoughts and comments. I would like to decide within a day or two. Best regards, Randall [1]

stem.project:roadmap-panel _______________________________________________ dna-dev mailing list dna-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/dna-dev

The Eclipse plugin is coming along very nice, but I almost prefer going with the current trunk (plus any critical issues), and have the Eclipse and query/search features show up in 0.7. Then 0.6 becomes more of an improvement over 0.5, whereas 0.7 would be another big-bang features release. On Aug 25, 2009, at 2:21 PM, Brian Carothers wrote: > I agree that we're due for an interstitial release. There's been a > lot > of clean-up and additions since 0.5. I think that we're pretty > close to > having the Eclipse plugin as well though - it may be work waiting a > week > for it. I'd love to hear others' opinions on that. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dna-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:dna-dev- >> bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Randall Hauch >> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:58 AM >> To: JBoss DNA >> Subject: [dna-dev] Releasing 0.6 >> >> During the 0.6 release cycle, we've added a few new features and >> fixed >> quite a few issues with the graph library, connectors, and JCR >> implementation [1]. In fact, a number of the issues required some >> fairly significant refactoring of the state management components in >> our JCR implementation. The original 0.6 plan, however, was >> include a >> search and query feature. I've made a lot of progress with search/ >> query, but I still have a few weeks of completing the feature >> development and integrating it with the connectors and JCR >> implementation. There are also a number of outstanding issues that >> we >> need/want to fix, so I'd guess we're still a month away from the >> planned 0.6 release. >> >> However, a number of people have taken a look at 0.5 recently, and >> they've run into some of the same issues that we've already fixed. >> They're currently using trunk, but have asked when the next stable >> release will be available. We can either continue our current >> plans, >> or change our schedule a bit and release 0.6 without the search/ >> query >> feature (or the fantastic Eclipse publishing plug-in). For the >> record, we released 0.5 on June 11, and that's just under 3 months > ago. >> >> I'm leaning toward releasing 0.6 early and moving the search/query >> and >> Eclipse features to the following release (which may actually be a >> 1.0 >> candidate). That would require me putting aside the search/query >> stuff for a few days (maybe a week) so that I can focus on fixing a >> number of the more critical and high-priority issues (we still >> have a >> few TCK regressions that we should fix before releasing) and > reviewing/ >> editing the documentation. But I think it's worth it so that we can >> get another much more stable release out the door for people to use. >> >> Please share your thoughts and comments. I would like to decide >> within a day or two. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Randall >> >> [1] >> > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/DNA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin > . > sy >> stem.project:roadmap-panel >> _______________________________________________ >> dna-dev mailing list >> dna-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/dna-dev > > _______________________________________________ > dna-dev mailing list > dna-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/dna-dev _______________________________________________ dna-dev mailing list dna-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/dna-dev

Guys, I was running some tests using SVN Repository Source. I got a few NPEs really easy to solve and also some issues related to requests trying to load "jcr:content[2]" properties from nodes. I was about to create a jira issue for this, but I saw you guys are already working on tickets DNA-240 and DNA-36 related to SVN connector. I appreciate if you guys could put DNA-240 back on release 0.6 since we from Caravela are very interested on using DNA connectors, including svn connector. Best regards, Feu Teston On Aug 25, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Randall Hauch wrote: > During the 0.6 release cycle, we've added a few new features and > fixed > quite a few issues with the graph library, connectors, and JCR > implementation [1]. In fact, a number of the issues required some > fairly significant refactoring of the state management components in > our JCR implementation. The original 0.6 plan, however, was > include a > search and query feature. I've made a lot of progress with search/ > query, but I still have a few weeks of completing the feature > development and integrating it with the connectors and JCR > implementation. There are also a number of outstanding issues that > we > need/want to fix, so I'd guess we're still a month away from the > planned 0.6 release. > > However, a number of people have taken a look at 0.5 recently, and > they've run into some of the same issues that we've already fixed. > They're currently using trunk, but have asked when the next stable > release will be available. We can either continue our current plans, > or change our schedule a bit and release 0.6 without the search/query > feature (or the fantastic Eclipse publishing plug-in). For the > record, we released 0.5 on June 11, and that's just under 3 months > ago. > > I'm leaning toward releasing 0.6 early and moving the search/query > and > Eclipse features to the following release (which may actually be a > 1.0 > candidate). That would require me putting aside the search/query > stuff for a few days (maybe a week) so that I can focus on fixing a > number of the more critical and high-priority issues (we still have a > few TCK regressions that we should fix before releasing) and > reviewing/ > editing the documentation. But I think it's worth it so that we can > get another much more stable release out the door for people to use. > > Please share your thoughts and comments. I would like to decide > within a day or two. > > Best regards, > > Randall > > [1] https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/DNA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... > _______________________________________________ > dna-dev mailing list > dna-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/dna-dev _______________________________________________ dna-dev mailing list dna-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/dna-dev