September 2006 - jboss-dev-forums

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Failure during deployment scan results in JBoss undeploy

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

You will have to diff the associated classes between 4.0.4.GA and 4.0.3SP1. http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=SubversionMigrationGuide View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3973624#3973624 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3973624

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Updating docs

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I guess the issue arises from trying to distinguish between classes of metadata attachments at the structural level: getPredeterminedManagedObjects, getTransientManagedObjects, getTransientAttachments. Its not clear that this can be manged easily. There are two problems I see with getting to the ultimate, fully resolved metadata. I see two distinct classes of metadata: Configuration and Managment. Both are built from different sources and scopes: - annotations - descriptors - overrides: vendor descriptors, profile service/management tools - aspects: deployment and runtime Both are graphs of objects whose nodes can be populated at any level. This is the metadata repository notion we have, that is not explicitly part of the current vdf spi. I don't see how we can build the object graphs without the metadata repository notion integrated. The two problems are 1, piecewise population of the object graph nodes, 2, seamless usage of the final, merged object. Let's take a concrete example of a java:comp/env object: | class Binding | { | /** enc relative name of the binding */ | String name; | /** type of the binding */ | Class type; | /** value of the binding */ | Object value; | } | class Link extends Binding | { | /** the raw link */ | String link; | /** the raw link type */ | enum LinkType {JndiName, DeploymentRef, ...} linkType; | /** the resolved name for the binding of the link */ | String resolvedName; | } | | /** Some derived property that allows a mgmt tool to list the enc bindings */ | @ManagedProperies({@MangedProperty("all-bindings") }) | class ENCMetadata | { | /** simple direct bindings in the enc */ | List<Binding> bindings; | /** links to bindings outside of the enc */ | List<Link> links; | } | This info is going to come from all levels: - annotations on the component the enc belongs to - deployment descriptor overrides - container overrides: for example, we introduce non-standard elements like the security domain name, current subject, as well as the standard container bindings; orb, tm, pm. - references to profile service managed bindings. One example would be property style references to elements managed at higer levels such as server hostname, logical name, cluster name, ... ... Ultimately an ENCAspect wants to install the javax.naming.Context for the ENCMetadata instance for the component its currently handling. Likewise, a management tools wants the to be able to display some representation of this Context. How this is pulled together from the current vdf classes is far from clear for me with the current spi. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3973622#3973622 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3973622

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Failure during deployment scan results in JBoss undeploy

by seanatwork

I just encountered this error in production and I currently cannot upgrade our servers. Where is the code fix for this? I would like to apply a patch to our current 4.0.3SP1 environment. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3973617#3973617 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3973617

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JBMESSAGING-549 - Lease set to -1 causes exception

by ovidiu.feodorov＠jboss.com

How about we don't change anything? Let's keep it simple. A setLeasePeriod(-1) seems clear enough and good enough for me. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3973614#3973614 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3973614

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JBMESSAGING-549 - Lease set to -1 causes exception

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I guess we can change the API.. since thie method is on a testcase and it's kind of non public API. (What you think Ovidiu? Tim?) I just think we should make a plan on change this. I just want to avoid having exceptions due to this change when you have the next release. We would have to change it right after you released. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3973613#3973613 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3973613

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - ServiceMBeanDelegate used by ServiceContainer could load fro

by kapilanand

hi I tried the jboss service extention in ejb3. It's really cool, except that it does not allow me to specify MBeanInfo and jmx console view does not remain much user-friendly. Is there a plan to define annotations and/or xml-descriptor for this? Or a quick fix could be to have ServiceMBeanDelegate class configurable so users may put their own implementation if need be (i feel the need will always be there) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3973604#3973604 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3973604

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: Custom Principal Propagation Related

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

I would like to end this discussion as there is no evidence of an issue with custom principal propagation from both outside the VM as well as inside the application server. Few things to remember: * A custom principal that is created by a login module is its view of the authenticated user. * Have the security domain between the layers involved in the propagation to be the same or have atleast one of the modules to be the custom principal creating login module. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3973603#3973603 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3973603

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JBMESSAGING-549 - Lease set to -1 causes exception

by tom.elrod＠jboss.com

Well, don't have to change anything, just seemed like would help avoid confusion in the future as to how everything works. If think adding setLeaseEnabled(boolean) would be better for you guys then would require you guys to change your code to call setLeaseEnabled(false) instead of using setLeasePeriod(-1) to disable leasing. Is really your call as to if would be worth making the code change (in both remoting and messaging) to gain this more explicit way of enabling/disabling leasing. My guess (and again is just my outside perspective) is that you would not want to introduce an api change? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3973582#3973582 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3973582

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: Custom Principal Propagation Related

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3687 I am not able to reproduce the issue with a test case. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3973579#3973579 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3973579

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: 3.2 alpha 1 release status

by falazar

Sounds great! A couple things we have noticed in heavy work on the web console is that the task assigned to swimlanes or pooled users is not showing up in the web console (thought the db shows them correctly), and if a task is assigned to a group, say CSD, and someone takes that task and completes it, the actorid is not being saved in the db. James View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3973578#3973578 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3973578

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums September 2006