February 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of the JBoss EJB Container] - Reducing Java object lock contention in org.jboss.invocation

by ScottMarlowNovell

I would like to try to reduce the object lock contention in PooledInvokerProxy.getPooledConnection(). We currently hold the lock while testing the connection and I think we could do a little better. I will a open a jira for tracking the work and will discuss the change proposal here. Scott View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009624#4009624 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009624

18 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JcaXAResourceRecovery

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

No, application managed security means an application context specific security aspect. If you want it hard coded in a class file the aspect uses a classloader. Same for a properties file. The point is, there is no reason why application managed security means that the username and password have to be passed to the jca provided connection factory getConnection call. If it is available because some user passed it in, fine, but it is not how server frameworks should be coded. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009619#4009619 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009619

18 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JcaXAResourceRecovery

by weston.price＠jboss.com

Thus defeating the purpose of application-managed security to begin with. Now you have a recorded credential (username/password) somewhere. Oh, BTW, you are assuming that the account has the appropriate DB permissions to execute recovery right ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009616#4009616 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009616

18 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: New wireformat

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I guess I was coding under the influence (CUI) American's have an acronym for Driving Under the Influence - DUI... I guess that has happened to me on coding :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009615#4009615 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009615

18 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Precedence level

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

That is an mc supplies notion with duplicate resolution based on the precedence number. It still leaves the problem of knowing what the universe of suppliers is. I suppose if seam components are deployed at the application phase in terms of the profile service notions of bootstrap, deployers, application phases, the phase deployer processing defines the supplier universe. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009604#4009604 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009604

18 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JcaXAResourceRecovery

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"weston.price(a)jboss.com" wrote : | How about a JDBC deployment that only support application-managed security? What if this is required information and can only be done via | getConnection(username,password)? | Then the configuration referenced by jca should map to a fixed username and password based security aspect that populates the caller Subject with the PasswordCredential. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009599#4009599 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009599

18 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JcaXAResourceRecovery

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

How authentication fits into javaee was the subject of jsr196 (Java Authentication SPI for Containers). It was not integrated into javaee 5 though. Your never going to have a standard properties file, or xml file for this info. There is an extension to the JAAS Configuration object that will have provider specific stores. All of our containers need to move to supporting this type of security aspect. The getX(username, password) of api is broken as it exposes security as an api with a non-extensible representation of identity and proof of identity rather than an aspect that can be configured for the operation environment. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009591#4009591 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009591

18 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Mixing schemas WildcardBinding exception

by adrian＠jboss.org

Your Schema was wrong. You had an infinite number of wildcards in an infinite number of choices. This is a bug in JBossXB since this should create a list of wildcards instead it tries to set the second wildcard in the first wildcard. There is an open bug report/test case about this. I removed the unbounded from the xsd:any and now it works properly. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009588#4009588 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009588

18 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: New wireformat

by timfox

"clebert.suconic(a)jboss.com" wrote : I've run the clustering testsuite... | | and the only failure I get now is FailoverTest::testFailoverMessageOnServer | | | It looks like we need a server valve, or some sort of lock on the server side, for while the serverSide failover is being executed. We already have a server side valve. Were you not aware of this? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009587#4009587 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009587

18 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JORAM Tests on integration testsuite

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

However I can't build the project. It's good enough for now... at least I can debug it properly now, but we will have to eventually fix the build. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009583#4009583 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009583

18 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums February 2007