April 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Indirect dependency names

by adrian＠jboss.org

So is this something I still need to look at or you've done a workaround? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143165#4143165 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143165

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Eclipse and the release process

by adrian＠jboss.org

You also need to document the thirdparty changes in the release notes, e.g. http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-246 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143159#4143159 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143159

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Indirect dependency names

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Ok, will do. The tests are passing again as of now. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143158#4143158 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143158

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Eclipse and the release process

by adrian＠jboss.org

Ales, when you commit the changes to the pom for thirdparty jars before a release, can you also run: | mvn dependency:sources | mvn eclipse:eclipse | That way the release will also have the correct eclipse project files tagged in SVN. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143157#4143157 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143157

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Indirect dependency names

by adrian＠jboss.org

Scott, if you commit a test that is failing can you also update the config to ignore failing tests otherwise other people's builds are broken. e..g | --- kernel/pom.xml (revision 71907) | +++ kernel/pom.xml (working copy) | <plugin> | <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> | <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId> | + <configuration> | + <testFailureIgnore>true</testFailureIgnore> | + </configuration> | </plugin> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143156#4143156 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143156

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Registering schema with JBossXB

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : | btw: who then holds the ref to the namespace string key? | OK, this - to have WeakHashMap on the string key - is a bug then. ;-) See SingletonSchemaResolverFactory constructor. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143147#4143147 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143147

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Invocation exception handling

by nhe

Hi, I have, as a workaround, in InvokerEJB3.handleException wrapped checked exceptions into InvocationTargetExceptions. Maybe a solution would be to change the InvocationHandler to first unwrap the MBeanException and then wrap it into a InvocationTargetException. /Niklas View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143130#4143130 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143130

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Indirect dependency names

by alesj

Perhaps we can create a new child Controller for every ComponentFactory? Meaning we could have beans with the 'same' name living side by side, e.g. multiple BeanContext beans. Annotating initial ComponentFactory instance with @ScopeFactoryLookup, and then applying the same annotation for all created beans. PreInstallAction is gonna handle them, and create child Controllers accordingly. I'll fix the caching of ScopeFactory in PreInstallAction. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143123#4143123 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143123

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Indirect dependency names

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Ok, I'll look at it once I've finished what I'm currently working on. | Does it have a test that shows what it is supposed to do but doesn't currently? Yes, org.jboss.test.kernel.deployment.test.BeanContainerUsageMDTestCase.testComponentBeanFactory which calls the org.jboss.test.kernel.deployment.test.BeanContainerUsageMDTestCase.getDeploymentForComponentBeanFactory to build the programatic deployment is what is testing this. I'm updating it for the current changes to get the names correct. Right not its building the BeanMetaData list a new for each create call so I don't think the clone issue applies yet. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143118#4143118 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143118

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Indirect dependency names

by adrian＠jboss.org

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : | It can, and currently does. Its just needing to rebuild the bean metadata list for the components for each new instance even though all that changes are the underlying mc bean names. In terms of types of metadata and relationships between then, nothing changes once the factory is initialized. If there was a name indirection on the dependency values then only that piece would need to be updated. | You can't install the BeanMetaData twice (i.e. use it as template) until Ales has finished the clone() stuff. "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | This code is checked in the jboss-kernel project tests under org.jboss.test.kernel.deployment.support.container.{spi,plugin}. | Ok, I'll look at it once I've finished what I'm currently working on. Does it have a test that shows what it is supposed to do but doesn't currently? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143116#4143116 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143116

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums April 2008