May 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Build broken with new AIO tests

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

"ataylor" wrote : | When running the perf examples i get no difference in performance between nio and asyncio, in fact when i set journal-sync to false nio is faster. What should i expect? I just realized this is awesome news actually. At the moment, the code is aways waiting for the callback before going to the next one: Every call to storeManager.persistMessage will only return when the callback is returned, or the message is persisted on disk. If this is performing as fast as noSync already.. this is great. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149458#4149458 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149458

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Nightly aggregator build is flawed

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

See http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149449#4149449 Please sync the hudson box with a ntp server. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149450#4149450 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149450

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Snapshots update (mvn -U)

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

OK, got it. The maven file name is wrong, The most recent artifact contains on older timestamp in the filename then the previous one. | 0.1.0-20080506.155037-61 | 0.1.0-20080507.084835-60 | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149449#4149449 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149449

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: To UTF-8 or not to UTF-8 that is the question

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

Just use UTF-16 encoding. You basically get this for free if you are just writing out chars. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149445#4149445 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149445

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: To UTF-8 or not to UTF-8 that is the question

by timfox

"ataylor" wrote : can we switch between using 2 or 4 bytes depending on the characters yes, that is what I mean with my comment that would "could do our own UTF-like encoding". The issue is getting that fast. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149444#4149444 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149444

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: To UTF-8 or not to UTF-8 that is the question

by ataylor

can we switch between using 2 or 4 bytes depending on the characters View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149443#4149443 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149443

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Build broken with new AIO tests

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

"timfox" wrote : Andy and I were just discussing on IRC how, the user (for alpha) should be able to download the distro, unzip, and type ant and it should work, no config necessary. | | Can we include libaio in the distro? If so, then we can programmatically set the java lib path and no conf is necessary? I have tried (without much success) to compile libaio statically. I'm still trying. But I would be concerned about redistributing libaio in our packages, since it is a OS dependent package. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149441#4149441 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149441

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Build broken with new AIO tests

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

"timfox" wrote : Ok, I worked out what is happening: | | AIO is picked up successfully when running tests on the command line, but is not picked up when running tests in eclipse. | | Probably because java.lib path is not set. | | That's what I said few posts ago: "clebert.suconic(a)jboss.com" wrote : I have changed the native library load a bit to make sure the conditional test for 32 and 64 bits are working. | | To make your life easier during development, you could change the script that starts your IDE to something like this: | | export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/extra/work-clebert/workspaces/jboss-messaging-trunk/trunk/native/bin:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH | | /usr/share/eclipse/eclipse | | | | "timfox" wrote : | | Can we avoid this dependency on java lib path? I don't really like the idea of users having to set env properties to get our software to run. It's messy IMHO. The only way around would be to install the library on /usr/lib, and we should have that when we have the RPM or .DEB package. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149440#4149440 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149440

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Snapshots update (mvn -U)

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

Here the "mvn deploy" output: | Uploading: https://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/ejb3/jboss-ejb3-core/0.1.0-S... | [...] | [INFO] Retrieving previous metadata from snapshots.jboss.org | [INFO] Uploading repository metadata for: 'snapshot org.jboss.ejb3:jboss-ejb3-core:0.1.0-SNAPSHOT' | [INFO] Retrieving previous metadata from snapshots.jboss.org | [INFO] Uploading repository metadata for: 'artifact org.jboss.ejb3:jboss-ejb3-core' | [INFO] Retrieving previous metadata from snapshots.jboss.org | [INFO] Uploading project information for jboss-ejb3-core 0.1.0-20080506.155037-61 | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149435#4149435 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149435

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - To UTF-8 or not to UTF-8 that is the question

by timfox

JBM 1.4 uses UTF-8 encoding for all strings sent in messages, e.g. properties, text message bodies etc. This provides a good compression if using higher unicode characters a lot (e.g. chinese), however the java UTF-8 encoding is *really slow*. For JBM 2.0 we're currently the SimpleString class I wrote (which doesn't copy itself on the drop of a hat like String) and we marshall it as a simple sequence of bytes. In my tests this is about 40 times faster than UTF-8 encoding the same string. :) Problem is SimpleString currently only stores each character as two bytes, which is fine for the vast majority of unicode characters but won't encode the far reaches of unicode which require 4 bytes. I can change SImpleString to use 4 bytes per character but this is going to make the marshalled form big - especially in the case of standard latin characters or european - about 4 times the size as encoded! How do you think we should deal with this? One possibility is we write our own UTF-like encoding implementation... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149433#4149433 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149433

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2008