July 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Why is a ProcessInstance not the same as an Execution

by jbarrez

Thomas, I don't agree fully with the example. The process definition is static. At runtime, instances are created from this definition (ie. class-object relation). If I need metadata, I put process variables on the instance before starting the process. Regional managers can then be picked based upon these variables. Changing this concept is bound to break some older implementations and is something that must be well-thought about before changing it... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162861#4162861 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162861

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Making Creators declare supported annotation types

by alesj

Is there a way that we could add additional information to the Creators used in AnnotationMetaDataDeployer, getting the annotation types they are able to handle. This would help with the performance when using my AltAnnotationMetaDataDeployer (GenericAnnotationDeployer), since we would only pass-in the classes that contain at least one of creator's supported annotation. The rest of the Creator's logic would remain the same, it's just the amount of classes that they scan that's gonna be a lot smaller. And the resources path matching is done at the right place, classloading + VFS level, no need for the likes of AnnotatedClassFilter. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162859#4162859 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162859

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Please review the BPM API

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Thanks for your feedback Alex. anonymous wrote : In PVM the process instance and the top level execution were recognized as being the same thing I started a separate thread for this here http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162852#4162852 anonymous wrote : Is "attachment" a synonym of [process] variable Attachments associated with an ExecutionContext are indeed similar to process variables. Only that they use generics, which gives us compile time checking for process variable usage. Attachments in a more general term can be associated with other constructs as well. The ProcessInstance for example has Attachments as well. anonymous wrote : The transition router usage model is not clear to me It is generally important to separate the concerns of user Activity and the Transition to the next Node. A credit card activity deals with credit card operations and should not have to have intimate knowledge of the ProcessDefinition. For example if the Node that deals with credit card processing becomes a new Transition "goto checking account on failure" the Activity that deals with the credit card provider should not have to be touched. Generally, the execution of user code is one thing, taking the next transition is another - both are fundamentally different. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162858#4162858 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162858

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Moving slow tests out into timing

by timfox

"ataylor" wrote : The unit tests are now running under a minute on my box. about 40 seconds of this however is because of the package org.jboss.messaging.tests.unit.core.journal.impl. These tests are integration tests and still need moving and we also still need to write some proper unit tests for the journal stuff. Right. Clebert should be on the case with this when he wakes :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162857#4162857 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162857

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Moving slow tests out into timing

by ataylor

The unit tests are now running under a minute on my box. about 40 seconds of this however is because of the package org.jboss.messaging.tests.unit.core.journal.impl. These tests are integration tests and still need moving and we also still need to write some proper unit tests for the journal stuff. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162856#4162856 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162856

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Why is a ProcessInstance not the same as an Execution

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Relates to http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=138615 http://jbpm.dyndns.org/jbpmwiki/index.php?title=JBPM3PublicAPI The ProcessDefinition is the static definition of a process. An Execution is a specific execution of a process. There is however the notion of ProcessDefinition plus an associated set of meta data. For example an organization has a defined process for 'Order Processing' However, Order Processing is slightly different per region (i.e. different regional managers) It would be incorrect to force a duplication of the ProcessDefinition per region. Instead we introduce the notion of ProcessInstance that can be configured through additional metadata | pim.createProcessInstance(pd, "apac.properties"); | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162852#4162852 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162852

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Persistence unit deployer

by wolfc

1. I've added org.jboss.jpa.resolvers.PersistenceUnitDependencyResolver which manages the kernel names for both the supplier and consumers. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162846#4162846 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162846

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: new test ant targets

by ataylor

you can also do: ant -Dtests.param=**/org/jboss/messaging/tests/unit/**/*Test.class tests and use a different test mask View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162842#4162842 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162842

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - new test ant targets

by ataylor

Ive added seperate ant targets for each of the type of tests we now have, unit-tests, timing-tests, integration-tests and performance-tests. all-tests still runs everything. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162840#4162840 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162840

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Abstractions again - MDR - sigh!

by alesj

Done. :-) - http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/jboss-mdr-cache/trunk And it uses the tests from MDR. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162839#4162839 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162839

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2008