May 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: JBAS-6875 discussion thread

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

Thanks; that was it. I'm an idiot and forgotten I'd started an AS instance earlier. This is checked in on Branch_5_0. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230238#4230238 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230238

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: JBAS-6875 discussion thread

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

the Branch_5_0 is correct. I did see the NamingMCUnitTest fail, but when I looked at it the problem was that a jbossas instance was running and the test that failed was trying to do a lookup against localhost:1099, expecting that this was the test generated jndi tree. The test must not be validating how this is getting setup, so you can ignore the failure. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230237#4230237 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230237

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: JBAS-6875 discussion thread

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

That's where I'm doing it yeah, unless you say not. I'd put it in trunk as well. I'm about to commit it to the branch, but NamingMCUnitTestCase.testMainBean fails. Is that a known issue? I think I've commented out my change and the test for it, and I still see that failure. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230236#4230236 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230236

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: JBAS-6875 discussion thread

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Is this going into the branch? https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/naming/branches/Branch_5_0 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230234#4230234 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230234

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: JBAS-6875 discussion thread

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

Just chatted with Ian and he says JON already has logic that recognizes a plugin config property with a value like "jnp://0.0.0.0:1099" and understands that the agent should connect via 127.0.0.1. So I think just writing that is fine. I'll add this in right now. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230230#4230230 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230230

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JmsConnectionPool: Allowing control over the number of S

by tfennelly

Thanks Kev. Can you explain why you consider #1 to be a better option, over #2? As I have it in my head at the moment (of course, I need to play with it in the code first), either option can accomodate for the issues you outline above. At the end of the day, I don't see too much difference between either option. I just thought #2 might be less intrusive :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230224#4230224 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230224

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: JBAS-6875 discussion thread

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

I'm trying to track down someone to answer my question about 0.0.0.0. I wrote a simple method to create a List that I can move into org.jnp.server.Main in about 5 mins if that's what they want. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230223#4230223 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230223

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: ManagedObjects for MBeans

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"jason.greene(a)jboss.com" wrote : Another issue that needs to be solved is association of a WAR deployment managed object to a tomcat Manager JMX entry. One possible way to correlate is to use the docBase property on the JSR-77 WebModule object. | | Even better would be a way to set the context root on the ManagedDeployment of the WAR. | | Is there an easy way for the AbstractWarDeployer to add a new ManagedProperty to the ManagedDeployment? ManagedDeployment properties are just the flattened view of all ManagedObject properties associated with the deployment. Where are you looking to use this? I'm still going over your changes. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230222#4230222 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230222

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Drools Dependencies in the ESB

by wollint

What components in the ESB depend on Drools? For example, if Drools was removed from the ESB what else would "break"? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230221#4230221 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230221

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: ManagedObjects for MBeans

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"jason.greene(a)jboss.com" wrote : I am currently looking into a way to provide overrides for statistic properties. The code mentions supporting annotation metadata on MBeanInfo Descriptors, however that would require patching tomcat to provide this info. Right. The only other way to pass this information in would be via the MDR MetaData interface. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230216#4230216 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230216

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2009