May 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Task completion without outcome?

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | i realize there must be an extra method to get the potential outcomes for a task dynamically. | IMO it doesn't require an additional method in TaskService. Instead it can be a property of a Task. I.e. | Set<String> Task.getOutcome() | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228963#4228963 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228963

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Task completion without outcome?

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | providing no value for outcome (or null) works if there is a single outgoing transition or if there is a transition without a name. | No, it doesn't. It leads to the error above. Hence my question. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228961#4228961 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228961

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Enforce transition names?

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

How do I signal when the transition doesn't have a name? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228959#4228959 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228959

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Enforce transition names?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

names should not be enforced. users should only be forced to specify transition names if it has a meaning/purpose for the user. even in case of multiple outgoing transitions, names should not be enforced. e.g. in case of a fork, we don't want to force process modellers to name all the outgoing transitions. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228956#4228956 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228956

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Task completion without outcome?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

i realize there must be an extra method to get the potential outcomes for a task dynamically. https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2220 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228951#4228951 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228951

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Task completion without outcome?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

outcome is the second optional parameter in the complete method. tasks bind the outcome to an outgoing transition. if no outcome is given, then the task should only have 1 outgoing transition. if a task has multiple outgoing transition, the outcome must be specified and match the transition name. providing no value for outcome (or null) works if there is a single outgoing transition or if there is a transition without a name. does this answer the question? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228949#4228949 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228949

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Jax-RPC WS Implementation in JBoss

by meet_ravip

Hi, We were using the Jax-RPC based Web Service Implementation in Sun Java Application Server.Now we are planning to port it to JBoss application server.So is there any limitation on using Jax-RPC webservice implementation in JBoss?.For wsdl2java approach can we use wsconsume tool for generating the jax-rpc-mapping,webservices.xml or we have to rely on sun wscompile tool?.Please give us some links or Samples,documentations. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228947#4228947 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228947

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Identity] - Re: Identity Management integration with JBossAS5.

by jeff.yuchang

OK, but I think we just need to move the distro module if we have to, the integration layer should be remain in the idm trunk, as that it has a very close relation to the idm. IMHO Again, if we move the distro to the platform build workspace, I would really like to see both of two have the same release cycle. -Jeff View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228926#4228926 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228926

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: XSL and other transformation engines

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

I would like us to focus on enabling alternative engines in this posting, rather than adding specific specialisations. So far we have XSL and FreeMarker to look at and, presumably, we can include the likes of velocity into the mix. Kev View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228921#4228921 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228921

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-1800 Current status on performance improvement

by wolfc

Unfortunately it still holds: 1. initialize Advisor (without it we can't add annotations) 1b. annotations from ejb3-interceptors-aop.xml are added 2. add annotations in Ejb3DescriptorHandler 3. re-initialize View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228918#4228918 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228918

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2009