July 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Creation of topic @ runtime

by desuraghu

I want to create a topic at runtime. In Jboss messaging 1.2 version I am able to create using ServerPeerMbean. But the same is not available in the 1.4.4 version. Can any one help me in resolving this issue. In JBM 1.4.4 version how can we create a topic/queue at runtime. Regards, Raghu View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243527#4243527 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243527

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: A lot of unscheduled 1.4 issues

by gaohoward

I'll take a look at them. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243526#4243526 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243526

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - A lot of unscheduled 1.4 issues

by timfox

I just took a look at the JBM JIRA unscheduled tasks report: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hi... Seems like there are a lot of issues users have added that haven't been triaged yet... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243513#4243513 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243513

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: Implement WorkContextProvider Check

by gurkanerdogdu

Hi; As I re-read chapter 10 and 11, "WorkCompletedException" may be thrown after a "Work" instance is run by a WorkManager (i.e, after it is accepted and started). In chapter 11, spec. says that if the "WorkManager" fails to setup work contexts that are provided by the "Work" instance before running the work instance, it throws WorkCompletedException with specific error codes. In my implementation, I put "setupWorkContext" code into the "doWork,startWork,scheduleWork" section of the WorkManagerImpl. It means that, exception may be thrown by the time resource adapter submits works to the manager, so we are able to catch wrong submissions early. Is it true or we have to change the location of the "setupWorkContext" to other place? I am confused here. Thanks; View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243436#4243436 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243436

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: Implement WorkContextProvider Check

by jeff.zhang

Hi Gurkan, Please see http://www.jboss.org/community/wiki/JBossJCAPOJODevelopment JBoss community use http://www.jboss.org/eclipse-settings.xml.zip as eclipse formatter. And we JCA team also use checkstyle for addition code style. hope useful. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243415#4243415 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243415

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: security domain used for securing remote access to Profi

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

This issue has been resolved. Note that the profileservice-jboss-beans.xml ProxyFactory bean has a createEjb3Links property which links the remoting proxy bindings to the old ejb3 facade names: |  | <property name="createEjb3Links">true</property> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243399#4243399 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243399

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: Implement WorkContextProvider Check

by jesper.pedersen

Applied. There were a couple of .undeploy() missing the test cases - I added those. Plus made it compile using JDK5. Thanks for the contribution :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243389#4243389 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243389

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: Implement WorkContextProvider Check

by gurkanerdogdu

"jesper.pedersen" wrote : The patches looks good. | and update the patches, that would be great :) I updated attachments after running checkstyle tool and correcting implementation. New attachments are suffixed with ".patch". I am not able to remove old attachments from jira, perhaps I have no enough permission to do this. Thanks; View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243368#4243368 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243368

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Embedded JBoss] - Re: Shortcomings of Virtual Archives (in progress)

by ALRubinger

OK cool, looks like we're both on the same page regarding the use cases and the issues then. So next to solve is "how". :) And then doing it. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243363#4243363 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243363

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Embedded JBoss] - Re: Shortcomings of Virtual Archives (in progress)

by jason.greene＠jboss.com

"ALRubinger" wrote : | "jason.greene(a)jboss.com" wrote : If you don't have a class instance, then you have a very different API, that operates off of Files/URLs. | | addClass(Class<?> class) simply delegates out to addResource(String resource): | Perhaps we are both saying the same thing (just differently)? My point was that these two methods should completely different behaviors. The class case should never need representation in the VFS, since the class instance (no matter where it came from), will work fine. In essence this is really the same as a specialized classloading configuration that pulls in files from outside the deployment. The major difference being that annotation scanning by frameworks such as ejb3 must be ran on these classes. The resource case, on the otherhand, makes perfect sense for custom VFS behavior, since these really are files. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4243356#4243356 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4243356

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2009